Got Fascism?

No, no you don’t.

Despite what-ever you may believe about diminishing constitutional protections, and growing governmental control… It is not Fascism.

The right-wing of America will go on about Fascist Obama, and the left-wing about Fascist Bush… The Libertarian will call them both Fascists! Not one of them are correct. The most, if not only, fundamental necessity to being a Fascist is completely void in nearly all people, and parties accused of being “Fascist”. The necessity being : Unity.

To understand the true base for the political theory of Fascism, one needs to look no further then the term : Fascism it self.
Fascis stemming from Latin and meaning bundle (bundle of sticks specifically). The ideology based from our most primitive, and natural understanding of man: united we are strong.
You take one stick and hit someone over the head with it, and the stick breaks, you take that same stick and tie it together with other sticks and hit the person again over the head, and this time the head breaks. Simple, and to the point, no room for confusion or misunderstanding; strength through unity is really the only requirement of Fascism. Everything else is defined by what consists(the commonality people unite around) of the “unity” and what the goal of the unity is. All of which an can(has) differed country to country.

You’re a fucking Fascist! 

I have been told time to time, I usually reply with a warm smile and say: yes in fact, yes I am.  Which is not the typical response to the accusation of being a dreadful Fascist.  But why should I be expected to censer my vocabulary because of others ignorance?

“Fascist”  has become an abstract slander that seems to imply the person being called a “Fascist” is in some way the oppressor of the accusing party. Therefore it is easy for opposing ends of the limited political spectrum  to accuse each other of being Fascist, and be firmly convinced in the accuracy of their accusations despite the glaring informal fallacy.

Despite the negative connotation associated with Fascism these days, I for one have not become a supporter of the Fascist philosophy because I am bitter, angry, or envious… In fact quite opposite, I am in awe of the thought of possibility of what can be achieved through a unified Mankind; people working for results instead of merely capital; people living for one another, rather then only one’s self… It is a beautiful thought, or dare I say hope for humanity… There is a fondness in the thought, somewhat like the scene in John Boorman’s Excalibur: after many wars King Author’s Knights, and people unified by final victory enjoying prosperity until, as the wise sage Merlin warned “for it is the doom of men that they forget”.


It remains to be seen if the idea of united man is as fantastical as the King Author tale.


In the meantime lets try and clarify what fascism is and what it is not.

“Never go to excess, but let moderation be your guide”. —Marcus Tullius Cicero    

Fascism is the moderation of the extremes of right and left on the political scale. While Fascist doctrines are truly organic and differ from Nation to Nation there are a few basic guidelines that most Fascist countries and parties have followed and in turn these guidelines are woven into international Fascist thought.


Commonalities in international Fascism


  •  National Goals: collective goals for society, ranging from anything to do with  structure, architecture, terraforming, science, exploration, knowledge, spirituality and so on… Compare the concept of National goals to the modern concepts of Liberal Democracies where the goals are not unified, but very individual, and the goal is: the obtainment of as much capital as possible. Capital which in turn is used to consume material trinkets.  As a result an overwhelming growth of spiritual nihilism has occurred in the people, life reduced purely to the here and now… Instant gratification addicts. It is of my opinion that the meaning to life becomes not only deeper but even more fulfilled when people are bound by the common climb, linked  achievement by achievement, celebrated breakthrough after breakthrough.


  • Nationalism: As opposed to Communism, and international Capitalism who both strive to achieve a vapidness of individual cultures either through force or commercialism. A Iron fisted control by wealthy peoples over the less fortunate in universal laws; imposed across the board,  forcefully destroying the  natural diversity of life.


  • One-Archy:  A principle philosophy of Fascist thought is : Thought & Action. A room full of squabbling old men with conflicting interests, and price tags on their votes is by no means what is thought of when one thinks of the manner a people progress together.One man, entrusted with the final decision. The people: intellectuals, philosophers, scientists, blue collar workers, white collar workers, the Thought the leader, the Action; The spear point of the direction. Which also means failure, or tyranny have one person to blame. The buck truly starts and stops with the figure head of the people. The Fascist dictator, is by no means a monarchy but rather a meritocracy.  Leaders chosen because of ability not bloodlines, or wealth. A brief synopsis of historical rule shows us:  The god-kings were replaced by the kings blessed by god and nobility, those nobles blessed by god were replaced by the merchants who rule today. Too few times have men of action and vision interrupted the status quo  of ruler-ship and crossed the proverbial Rubicon.


  • Government oversight and/or control over  mass industry and mass media: Mass industry and media are over-looked by the state, ensuring the needs of a people are met. Over and under production are avoided, or at least attempt to avoid such things, the state meditates between workers and owners when problems arise. The economy becomes a well calculated equation that exists to serve and advance people. As opposed to heartless Capitalism which only underlying concern is profit. Instead of a attempt at a calculated direction of economy it is dog eat dog, and brotherhood takes a backseat numbers. Misuse of man can be seen through-out the whole American Liberal Capitalist Democracy…  First the Irish and other non-WASP Europeans, followed by Africans… When man moved away from slavery, the wage slave came into existence, recently the illegal Mexican immigrant population has heavily filled this role, only to slowly be replaced by machines….And of what the people of the American Nation? The citizen is tossed aside for capital… Industry gutted, small business stamped out and farms bankrupt, monopoly and oligarchy orgies in vogue.


  • Meritocracy: True equal opportunity of man. Schooling made available to everyone, the same level of education regardless of class, wealth, birth etc.. Advancement through ones actions and results. The communist says we are all equal despite results! The modern democracy says we all have equal opportunity, but people with more money just have more of an equal opportunity. The Fascist says we all have the same starting point and may we all finish where we are best suited.





 Common falsities of Fascism


“In Fascism there is no free speech

There is no actual thing as “free speech”, no matter the society all speech is and has been open to consequences. The same hold true for Fascist society. Debate on policy, philosophy and direction have always played a vital part in Fascist government. On the other hand, attacking policy, philosophy, direction, etc… Has typically been suppressed. A fine line is drawn between healthy debate, and confrontational attacks.

“Fascist are all racist”

Racialism is not a commonalty among Fascist ideologies. Some have adopted a race science philosophy other have not… Nationality on the other hand is commonalty. Today, In America specifically many racist skinheads, or White Nationalists, identify themselves or are identified by the media as “Fascist”. But in reality the average WN “fascist” has about as deep an understanding in Fascist philosophy as the average American Christian does Christianity, or the modern suburban Marxist does Communism. That is to say shallow at best.

“Fascist are religious zealots”

Much like the racism aspect, religions or lack there of depend on the individual party. Some Fascist parties have been heavily Christian, other used the political ideology as their religion… It can be said Fascist philosophy embraces spiritualism, and a profound interest and awe of the meta…So therefore not atheistic, but not universally in support of a specific religion as well.

“Fascism is war like and murderous”

Man is war like and murderous. Murder, war, slavery, hate, etc. all exist in man, and have existed in every form of government man has created, present day included. No form of government is more murderous than the other by itself. Some people, leaders, eras have been bloodier than the next, but any political system by itself can not be credited with being more violent then the next. To suggest so is pure hyperbole.

“Fascism kills individual freedom, competition, and creativity”.

Fascism is not Communism. Competition exists and is in fact encouraged. Individual freedoms typically have remained as they are today. As far as creativity, if you ever have the misfortune of living under a heavily religious Fascist regime then I could image creativity being stifled a bit. Outside of Islam I don’t foresee that even remotely being a possibility. There is a somewhat famous quote that goes:

“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”

Wrapped in the flag, maybe, carrying a cross? Not a chance. Modern Christians are included when we speak of the spiritual nihilism of modernity’s subjects. The Christain nihillist of today live for the here and now as much as the atheist. Religious Fascist movements depend on religious fanaticism, discipline, and sacrifice. All of which are traits lacking in general American population. Gorging on BBQ and beer after Sunday mass doesn’t quite fit the bill. If a society draws a figurative line in the sand signifying what they will accept, and your creativity crosses that line, then you must be prepared to face consequences. But once again, that is the same in most societies regardless of political system.


Fascism remains a misnomer to most people. The fear of the thought of a unified people living for something other then capital will ensure that it remains a negative stigma used as a slanderous term, inciting argument, name-calling, and dis-unity. No need to fear being associated with such a great and positive ideal even if many dysfunctional hypocrites are attracted to the negative stigmatized caricature of Fascism that exists today. So the next time someone calls you a fucking Fascist, smile real wide, offer your hand to them and say “Yes, I am, now let me explain why you should be  too”.




“Do you want to live forever”?

The chick from “Conan” once asked.











Hmmmmmm… I don’t know, but I wouldn’t mind a few extra centuries added on.

Seems far fetched, but, people are hard at work, today… This exact moment, as I type this, looking for ways to prolong healthy life. Gains have been made, but as of today the promise of gains outweigh the actual gains in the lab.

Ponce de León is reborn! Well, maybe not, but the magic of the story about his quest for eternal life has been. The Spanish explorer today is played by Aubrey de Grey and Ray Kurzweil. Both, of course are not the only players involved, but both are the leading faces of their respected, similar but different, approaches to strategies in expanding the human life span.

Similar in the sense, that they both seek ways to prolong life; different in the approach. Aubrey de Grey is looking for the fountain of youth inside of our bodies meanwhile Kurzweil wishes to create the fountain of youth through technology in what is called: Transhumanism.

The Aubrey de Grey Biological approach:

Aubrey de Grey is not your stereotypical scientist, which is exactly why he is at the forefront of the battle against aging. Whether it is his uncanny resemblance to Rasputin, his love of beer, or the fact he didn’t even go to school for the field he has caused such a stir in… It is abundantly clear Aubrey de Grey has been a breath of fresh air and fresh ideas to a stagnant field.

So he is a refreshing eccentric character,in the usually dull world of gerontology,  but what about his ideas.

De Grey describes a moment late into the night where the SENS idea came to him, or as he explained: “Grabbing a notepad, I jotted down the molecular and cellular changes that I could confidently list as important targets for the new class of anti-aging therapies that I would soon call SENS, the ‘Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence’.”

After coming to the conclusion, that, the fields of Gerontology and Geriatrics were plagued with issues, that make it extremely difficult to be successful in achieving any kind of worthwhile senescence, de Grey, decided to attack the issue by focusing on the moderate middle ground:

“At root, I was addressing a simple question: if geriatrics fails because prevention is better than a cure, and gerontology fails because our understanding of metabolism is so limited, then might an intermediate target be the best of both worlds? Might it be possible to repair damage after its been laid down (hence avoiding the need to understand the details of how laid down) but before it spirals out of control (hence also avoiding the losing battle that is geriatrics)?”

De Grey describes this as the “Engineering approach”:

By dealing with the middle ground…The damage de Grey proposes the problems left to deal with are only 7, rather then the countless issues involved in the Metabolism and Pathology stages, de Grey suggests we focus on the 7 stages of damge:

(1) damage: Cell loss, cell atrophy-Possible solutions– Cell therapy, mainly.

(2) damage: Junk outside cells-Possible solutions: Phagocytosis by immune stimulation.

(3) damage: Crosslinks outside cells- Possible solutions: AGE-breaking molecules/enzymes.

(4) damage: Death-resistant cells- Possible solutions: Suicide genes, immune stimulation

(5) damage: Mitochondrial mutations- Possible solutions: Allotopic expression of 13 proteins.

(6) damage: Junk inside cells- Possible solutions: Transgenic microbial enzymes.

(7) damage: Nuclear[epi] mutations (only cancer matters)- Possible solutions: Telomerase/ ATL gene deletion plus periodic stem cell reseeding.

Aubrey de Grey goes into details about the science and theories behind his SENS plan, in his book : Ending Aging

A SENS challenge was offered to anyone who could prove de Grey’s theories had no base in reality. 20 thousand dollars were put up and panel of judges, not attributed to either party, have to this day awarded no one the cash.

What de Grey believes is not just simply cracking the human code in our life time and living forever, but rather a prolonging of life, followed by another break through, and more prolonging of life on top of that and so on. This is what de Grey describes as “longevity escape velocity

“longevity escape velocity” is highly dependent on something that Kurzweil also depends on and that is the : “law of accelerating returns” , which basically means:  the rate of change in a wide variety of evolutionary systems (including but not limited to the growth of technologies) tends to increase exponentially. Which is just piggy backed off Moore’s law, which states: in the history of computing hardware whereby the number of transistors that can be placed inexpensively on an integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years.

For example, after years of research, scientists extended healthy living another 20 years, and within those extra 20 years, with technological advancements and knowledge growth, another breakthrough happens that extends healthy life by 30 years this time, and the process continues on.

De Grey likes to bring up the process of humans learning to fly…  Explaining, that it took thousands of years to figure out how to fly, but once we did figure it out, in a relatively short time, we had fighter jets and spaceships. This is how de Grey and Kurzweil think things will go in their own feilds… After the first major breakthrough, there will be many to follow in a relatively short amount of time.

Aubrey de Grey:

Aubrey de Grey VS Richard Sprott (1/6) Debate

Kurzweil and Transhumanism

From science to science fiction! Tranhumanism would seem to be science fiction,if it were not for the simple fact the ideas of Tanhumanism are very plausible. Ray Kurzweil is an inventor, author, “futurist” among many other things. His inventions aside, Kurzweil is most know for his belief in the “singularity“, which is when Humans merge with technology, kinda like the Borg from Star Trek.

Like with de Greys beliefs the steps to complete Transhumanism starts with basic steps, first we will have nanobots placed in us, which will help prolong our lives, by attacking diesse, curing inflammation, and whatever else is needed… Or how about Google in your brain? To be able to do a Google search by simply thinking to do so. The law of accelerating returns is also implied here for the continual advancement in technology.

But these amazing possiblies are not even Kurzweil’s endgame; he foresees a day when we can actually download our consciousness on to a hard drive, much like the cylons from the recent Battlestar Galactica series.

Is it even possible to be able to do such a thing? If it was it would shatter allot of peoples view of the “soul”; so we could imagine allot of concern and downright fear from many people (esp religious types) if such a thing were ever close to becoming reality.  But more-so then that, what would become of man;we would essentially stop being human, and become artificial intelligence ourselves.

Kurzweil believes many of these things will take place by 2045.









Kurzweil, all his accomplishments aside, is quite the interesting character…The more virtually real cyber life becomes the more he can build his online ego of a famous female pop star singer. What was that Weininger was saying about Jews and femininistic nature? Despite his freakness, many of the things he has predicted has come about, which leads many to believe allot of the things he is saying now will come to fruition.







Personally, call me paranoid, but I am not allowing a freaking Google chip in my head or nanobots in my body. The possibitly for the powers that be to abuse these possible inventions is just too great.

Mankind, must not be short sighted in the hunt for AI and Tranhumainsm, after Pandora’s box has been opened it might be too late. When I read books like “the singularity is near” it makes me think the “terminator scenario” is all too real.

While many questions and hesitations keep me weary of the possible singularity, the exact opposite can be said for my enthusiasm towards de Grey’s work…Call it a more natural path to longevity. The possibly of man, through the mastering of his body,and eugenics, being able to expand life span by 100’s or even 1000’s of years is quite magnificent, and, in my belief, the proper path towards Overman.

Outside of drugs, supplements, HGH, etc, what can you do to prolong your life? EAT LESS! Yes, really it’s that simple… The 20% rule, eat 20% less then you daily suggest calorie intake for your BMI. So far, that is the only clinically proven  natural method of generally prolonging your life…Always good to keep the body, a little hungry, is the rule.

Otto Weininger


“Dietrich Eckart once told me that in all his life he had known just one good Jew: Otto Weininger, who killed himself on the day when he realized that the Jew lives on the decay of peoples” Adolf Hitler (Table Talks 41-44, pg 141)

Otto Weininger was an introspective philosopher who crucified himself in his works, as he analyzed Jewishness, thus analyzing himself.  Weininger, at the young age of 23 decided (allegedly because of his inability to supersede his nature)  his only viable option was to commit suicide. So, to set the perfect ambiance, he rented the room Beethoven died in, and shot himself.

In his last major work: Sex and Character He dives into many philosophical subjects, mainly dealing with the male-female dynamic. 

The most interesting (in my opinion) part of Sex and Character, is when Weininger discusses Judaism, Jewishness, the differences between, Jews and non-Jews, and ultimately analyzing himself through his people.

The following are excerpts from the chapter entitled “Judaism” in S & C (Pg. 301-330)

“I must, however, make clear what I mean by Judaism; I mean neither a race nor a people nor a recognized creed. I think of it as a tendency of the mind, as a psychological constitution which is a possibility for all mankind, but which has become actual in the most conspicuous fashion only amongst Jews.”

Weininger, is speaking about, what is today called: the “spiritual Jew”.

The spiritual Jew, does not require Jewish genetic links, or to practice Judaism as a religion, but simply to adopt and embrace Jewish ideology and mentality, which in this case can be summed up as : modernity.  One might scoff at the idea of the spiritual Jew, and only view the issue as solely a biological matter, but that would be a costly mistake, as there are millions of genetic Jews, but billions of spiritual Jews.

The concept of the spiritual Jew, or the self-Jew, is largely ignored by the “its da jews” crowd, because it requires introspective awareness, self conflict, and eventually change in the manner of (self) evolution. While it is easy to point the finger at the idea of the Jew, it is hard to deal with the inborn Jew. Therefore, the most determining battle (within one’s self) goes largely ignored. 

“There are Aryans who are more Jewish than Jews”… I am sure many a Gentile CEO can be placed under the same banner.

“The Antisemitism of the Jews bears testimony to the fact that no one who has had experience of them considers them lovable not even the Jew himself.” 

Weininger on Jews and femininity:

“It would not be difficult to make a case for the view that the Jew is more saturated with femininity than the Aryan, to such an extent that the most manly Jew is more feminine than the lest manly Aryan. This interpretation would be erroneous. It is most important to lay stress on the agreements and differences simply because so many points that become obvious in dissecting women reappear in the Jew.”

“The true conception of the state is foreign to the Jew, because he, like the woman, is wanting in personality; his failure to grasp the idea of true society is due to his lack of a free intelligible ego.”

“As there is no real dignity in women, so what is meant by the word ‘gentleman’ does not exist amongst Jews.”

“Our age is not only the most Jewish but the most feminine.”

The femininity in the nature of Jews, has long been a topic of conversation and debate, all the way from the days of Thule style Aryans and a solar (masculine) identity and Jews, with lunar (feminism) role…All the way to today with the destruction of masculine concepts of honor, nobility,etc, for material impulsive femininity.

On Zionism:

“Zionism is the negation of Judaism, for the conception of Judaism involves a world-wide distribution of the Jews”

The next time someone wishes to parade the “Rabbis against Zionism” as some kind of virtuous characters of righteousness, they ought might want to remember Weininger’s words on the matter. As the question of Jewish statehood is a debated subject amongst some Jews, not because of the actions of the state, but rather a simple religious disagreement.

On Jews and medicine:

“The present turn of medical science is largely due to the influence of Jews…They would make it a matter of drugs, and mere administration of chemicals.”

 Big pharmaceutical, before pharmaceutical got big.

Like most introspective Jews, Otto had the fantasy that he could simply convert away his Jewishness:

“There is no more an absolute Jew than an absolute Christian.”

“I have no wish to boycott the Jew, or by any such immoral means to attempt to solve the Jewish Question.”

“To defeat Judaism, the Jew must first understand himself and war against himself. So far, the Jew has reached no further than to make and enjoy jokes against his own peculiarities.”

“Only steady resolution, united to the highest self-respect, can free the Jew from Jewishness.”

“The Jew, indeed, who has become Christian, has the fullest right to be regarded by the Aryan in his individual capacity, and no longer be condemned as belonging to a race above which his moral efforts raised him.”

Did Weininger truly believe he could battle himself, and cleanse his Jewishness? Maybe… But would his suicide then be the result of this question?

Weininger on Suicide:

 “The suicider is almost always a sadist, because he alone wants to get out of a situation and can act; a masochist must first question all eternity whether he may, should, take his own life”


It would seem Otto’s struggles with himself, his identity, and his failure to overcome himself, or convince others that he had overcome himself lead him to take his own life. Weininger allegedly wrote two letters (one to his father, and one to his brother) before he shot himself. The letters have not been made public.

 Otto Weininger was buried in theMatzleinsdorf Protestant Cemetery in Vienna. The epitaph by his father translates:

“This stone closes the resting place of a youth whose spirit never found rest on earth. And when he had made known the revelations of his spirit and of his soul, he could no longer bear to be among the living. He sought out the death precinct of one of the greatest in Vienna’s Schwarzspanier house, and there destroyed his bodily existence.”

Catechism of the Revolutionist

Sergei Nechayev did not play games when it came to revolution. His work entitled Catechism of the Revolutionist is a hard hitting piece that penetrates like a hard dick, while modernites flaccidly fumble around looking for excuses for their inactivity.

Politically it is said, Nechayev was everything from and anarchist to “Barracks communistas Marx called it. His politics are really irrelevant, what matters was and is his analysis on revolutionary activities and mindset.

What is quickly realized by the reader is: You are bluffing in your “revolt”. A hardened, focused mindset and behavior is demanded from Nechayev as he spells out the necessary steps to making the individual dedicated to Revolt.

Friends that are not fanatical revolutionist…Forget about it. That sweet girl in your class…Forget about it… The message is simple: Live, breath, kill, fuck, and die Revolution. There is nothing else.

Enjoy your heart-check:

From Chapter 2 of COTR:

The Duties of the Revolutionary toward Himself

1. The revolutionary is a doomed man. He has no personal interests, no business affairs, no emotions, no attachments, no property, and no name. Everything in him is wholly absorbed in the single thought and the single passion for revolution.

2. The revolutionary knows that in the very depths of his being, not only in words but also in deeds, he has broken all the bonds which tie him to the social order and the civilized world with all its laws, moralities, and customs, and with all its generally accepted conventions. He is their implacable enemy, and if he continues to live with them it is only in order to destroy them more speedily.

3. The revolutionary despises all doctrines and refuses to accept the mundane sciences, leaving them for future generations. He knows only one science: the science of destruction. For this reason, but only for this reason, he will study mechanics, physics, chemistry, and perhaps medicine. But all day and all night he studies the vital science of human beings, their characteristics and circumstances, and all the phenomena of the present social order. The object is perpetually the same: the surest and quickest way of destroying the whole filthy order.

4. The revolutionary despises public opinion. He despises and hates the existing social morality in all its manifestations. For him, morality is everything which contributes to the triumph of the revolution. Immoral and criminal is everything that stands in its way.

5. The revolutionary is a dedicated man, merciless toward the State and toward the educated classes; and he can expect no mercy from them. Between him and them there exists, declared or concealed, a relentless and irreconcilable war to the death. He must accustom himself to torture.

6. Tyrannical toward himself, he must be tyrannical toward others. All the gentle and enervating sentiments of kinship, love, friendship, gratitude, and even honor, must be suppressed in him and give place to the cold and single-minded passion for revolution. For him, there exists only one pleasure, on consolation, one reward, one satisfaction – the success of the revolution. Night and day he must have but one thought, one aim – merciless destruction. Striving cold-bloodedly and indefatigably toward this end, he must be prepared to destroy himself and to destroy with his own hands everything that stands in the path of the revolution.

7. The nature of the true revolutionary excludes all sentimentality, romanticism, infatuation, and exaltation. All private hatred and revenge must also be excluded. Revolutionary passion, practiced at every moment of the day until it becomes a habit, is to be employed with cold calculation. At all times, and in all places, the revolutionary must obey not his personal impulses, but only those which serve the cause of the revolution.

The Relations of the Revolutionary toward his Comrades

8. The revolutionary can have no friendship or attachment, except for those who have proved by their actions that they, like him, are dedicated to revolution. The degree of friendship, devotion and obligation toward such a comrade is determined solely by the degree of his usefulness to the cause of total revolutionary destruction.

9. It is superfluous to speak of solidarity among revolutionaries. The whole strength of revolutionary work lies in this. Comrades who possess the same revolutionary passion and understanding should, as much as possible, deliberate all important matters together and come to unanimous conclusions. When the plan is finally decided upon, then the revolutionary must rely solely on himself. In carrying out acts of destruction, each one should act alone, never running to another for advice and assistance, except when these are necessary for the furtherance of the plan.

10. All revolutionaries should have under them second- or third-degree revolutionaries – i.e., comrades who are not completely initiated. these should be regarded as part of the common revolutionary capital placed at his disposal. This capital should, of course, be spent as economically as possible in order to derive from it the greatest possible profit. The real revolutionary should regard himself as capital consecrated to the triumph of the revolution; however, he may not personally and alone dispose of that capital without the unanimous consent of the fully initiated comrades.

11. When a comrade is in danger and the question arises whether he should be saved or not saved, the decision must not be arrived at on the basis of sentiment, but solely in the interests of the revolutionary cause. Therefore, it is necessary to weigh carefully the usefulness of the comrade against the expenditure of revolutionary forces necessary to save him, and the decision must be made accordingly.

The Relations of the Revolutionary toward Society

12. The new member, having given proof of his loyalty not by words but by deeds, can be received into the society only by the unanimous agreement of all the members.

13. The revolutionary enters the world of the State, of the privileged classes, of the so-called civilization, and he lives in this world only for the purpose of bringing about its speedy and total destruction. He is not a revolutionary if he has any sympathy for this world. He should not hesitate to destroy any position, any place, or any man in this world. He must hate everyone and everything in it with an equal hatred. All the worse for him if he has any relations with parents, friends, or lovers; he is no longer a revolutionary if he is swayed by these relationships.

14. Aiming at implacable revolution, the revolutionary may and frequently must live within society will pretending to be completely different from what he really is, for he must penetrate everywhere, into all the higher and middle-classes, into the houses of commerce, the churches, and the palaces of the aristocracy, and into the worlds of the bureaucracy and literature and the military, and also into the Third Division and the Winter Palace of the Czar.

15. This filthy social order can be split up into several categories. The first category comprises those who must be condemned to death without delay. Comrades should compile a list of those to be condemned according to the relative gravity of their crimes; and the executions should be carried out according to the prepared order.

16. When a list of those who are condemned is made, and the order of execution is prepared, no private sense of outrage should be considered, nor is it necessary to pay attention to the hatred provoked by these people among the comrades or the people. Hatred and the sense of outrage may even be useful insofar as they incite the masses to revolt. It is necessary to be guided only by the relative usefulness of these executions for the sake of revolution. Above all, those who are especially inimical to the revolutionary organization must be destroyed; their violent and sudden deaths will produce the utmost panic in the government, depriving it of its will to action by removing the cleverest and most energetic supporters.

17. The second group comprises those who will be spared for the time being in order that, by a series of monstrous acts, they may drive the people into inevitable revolt.

18. The third category consists of a great many brutes in high positions, distinguished neither by their cleverness nor their energy, while enjoying riches, influence, power, and high positions by virtue of their rank. These must be exploited in every possible way; they must be implicated and embroiled in our affairs, their dirty secrets must be ferreted out, and they must be transformed into slaves. Their power, influence, and connections, their wealth and their energy, will form an inexhaustible treasure and a precious help in all our undertakings.

19. The fourth category comprises ambitious office-holders and liberals of various shades of opinion. The revolutionary must pretend to collaborate with them, blindly following them, while at the same time, prying out their secrets until they are completely in his power. They must be so compromised that there is no way out for them, and then they can be used to create disorder in the State.

20. The fifth category consists of those doctrinaires, conspirators, and revolutionists who cut a great figure on paper or in their cliques. They must be constantly driven on to make compromising declarations: as a result, the majority of them will be destroyed, while a minority will become genuine revolutionaries.

21. The sixth category is especially important: women. They can be divided into three main groups. First, those frivolous, thoughtless, and vapid women, whom we shall use as we use the third and fourth category of men. Second, women who are ardent, capable, and devoted, but whom do not belong to us because they have not yet achieved a passionless and austere revolutionary understanding; these must be used like the men of the fifth category. Finally, there are the women who are completely on our side – i.e., those who are wholly dedicated and who have accepted our program in its entirety. We should regard these women as the most valuable or our treasures; without their help, we would never succeed.

The Attitude of the Society toward the People

22. The Society has no aim other than the complete liberation and happiness of the masses – i.e., of the people who live by manual labor. Convinced that their emancipation and the achievement of this happiness can only come about as a result of an all-destroying popular revolt, the Society will use all its resources and energy toward increasing and intensifying the evils and miseries of the people until at last their patience is exhausted and they are driven to a general uprising.

23. By a revolution, the Society does not mean an orderly revolt according to the classic western model – a revolt which always stops short of attacking the rights of property and the traditional social systems of so-called civilization and morality. Until now, such a revolution has always limited itself to the overthrow of one political form in order to replace it by another, thereby attempting to bring about a so-called revolutionary state. The only form of revolution beneficial to the people is one which destroys the entire State to the roots and exterminated all the state traditions, institutions, and classes in Russia.

24. With this end in view, the Society therefore refuses to impose any new organization from above. Any future organization will doubtless work its way through the movement and life of the people; but this is a matter for future generations to decide. Our task is terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction.

25. Therefore, in drawing closer to the people, we must above all make common cause with those elements of the masses which, since the foundation of the state of Muscovy, have never ceased to protest, not only in words but in deeds, against everything directly or indirectly connected with the state: against the nobility, the bureaucracy, the clergy, the traders, and the parasitic kulaks. We must unite with the adventurous tribes of brigands, who are the only genuine revolutionaries in Russia.

26. To weld the people into one single unconquerable and all-destructive force – this is our aim, our conspiracy, and our task.

Yukio Mishima

Yukio Mishima stands as the last person to commit Seppuku in Japan.

Yukio wrote many things and stared in a few movies. He was disgusted with the new capitalist, democracy his once honorable people had become engulfed in. In a last ditch effort to raise the samurai spirit from the ashes he made a plea to his military comrades and then departed this world through the act of honorable self sacrifice. Enjoy the videos of a brave man who died for the cause he held so dear.