Adolf Hitler was a christian carpet muncher…who might of been gay and impotent as well.

The life and times of Adolf Hitler holds a special place in my heart. Years ago (sadly too many years ago now) back when I was around 21 I was put into (through fate and my own action) quite the predicament; in order to spare the reader a long detour having nothing to do with Hitler’s life I’ll sum it up like this: after a drunken brawl in the parking lot of a bar my attacker lay dead and I remained alive sitting in a jail cell facing a life sentence in prison.

With the dreadful possibility of spending the rest of my life (or even the majority of it) behind bars I had to convince myself of a reason to live if the worst outcome of life in prison were to befall me… I found that reason, and that reason was: Knowledge. I would learn about the world: past, present and future, more importantly I would learn about myself, and maybe even improve myself!

Now that I had some go in me, I began to read, and think like I never had before… My shoty American brain, raised on TV, public school, and porn now began to learn about the great past struggles and victories of mankind, the awe-inspiring theories and thoughts of great thinkers, and the countless sacrifices of brave souls to move the wheels of time forward.

There was a library in the county jail I was in, and when I was not reading state law to prepare for trial, I was escaping (in mind at least) in a book. One day, with the same morbid curiosity one would pick up a book on Ted Bundy with, I picked up Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler… It was finally time to see what History’s most evil man ever had to say for himself!

I began to read, and it did not take long for me to have a diamond bullet to the brain moment, followed by many more… The Germany he feared was the America I lived in- thoughts of community over individualism,but I had been so selfish up till then living for my pleasures over everything else- a never ending quest to understand and improve yourself-the Jewish Question(which I spent the follow decade or so obsessing over)…Of the many things that dawned on me as I read what really suck out was the fact of how much I have been lied to. My TV, my teachers, my friends, my parents, all lied to me, and to add insult to injury the truth was in plain sight the whole time!

From that moment (as often happens when someone or something has a major impact on your life) Hitler became a demigod in my mind, I placed him on a pedestal, he wasn’t even Human anymore, he was a messiah… some people stop there, but I went on, learned more about him, his views, his politics, his character, and naturally the more I learned of him the less godly he became: flaws, weaknesses, disagreements, contradictions until finally he became who he was, like all the others that have carved their names into the pillars of History: Human…be it more human than  us humans, but nevertheless Human.


Be he a man that tapped into his will to achieve mind-blowing results (going from a homeless artist to right up there with Jesus in worldly name recognition today), he by far was not the first person to climb to great heights from such low starting positions…. But, despite the historical arguments of this or that ancient Greek taking pecker or not, no one by far has had the cloud of confusion around them as Adolf Hitler does.

The more I became acquainted with the internet {Fortune  blessed me with a charge of imperfect self-defense; got a handful of years } the more I theories I saw, and people taking these theories seriously, despite the very shaky foundations.

Off the top of my head I can recall quite a few:

Hitler was gay

Hitler was a womanizer

Hitler was a child molester

Hitler was involved in incest

Hitler was a sociopath

Hitler loved his niece

Hitler was impotent

Hitler had syphilis

Hitler was Atheist

Hitler was Christian

Hitler in fits of rage, would jump to the floor and chew the edges of carpets

Hitler hated Jews because he was denied into Art school

Being gassed in WW1 turned Hitler into a great public speaker

Hitler was Jewish

Hitler was a Rothschild

Hitler was a coward

Hitler was a megalomaniac who sought power for himself above all

Hitler was subservient to international bankers

Hitler disarmed(gun laws) the German public

If I sit here and think longer on it I am sure a few more claims will come to me from my foggy memory… But you get the point, of course you do, you grew up like I in this world Internationale, we all learned and heard the same things about this come to life comic book villain character named simply: Hitler.

But what of it all…all the claims, many of them contradicting, what is actually comic book and what is reality… unfortunately like most things not experienced by the self, the complete reality may never be known, but, thankfully much does exist. And if even, as all things of History, we may not know the complete puzzle, we do have many pieces in this case which can at least show us a good portion of the picture and help us at least have an educated imagination about whatever pieces remain missing.

The knee jerk reaction as to why so much contradicting confusion surrounds Hitler is, of course: Jews Own The media! But wait! Even though there is validity to the accusation Remember… when you point your finger at someone three fingers are pointing right back at you. And so it is in this case as well.

Many of us have been in arguments with people or seen arguments where both sides differed vastly on a subject, but both professed to know the truth or have the best solution. How could two people be so different but so convinced on a single topic? As, has kinda just been generally known or suspected for quite some time, and possibly being even confirmed by science: people tend to view things through their own filter, once they have adopted a worldview they tend to view the world under a certain perspective.  The same can be implied to hero and villain worship: The people who viewed Adolph Hitler as a villain, would believe and promote things that they personally found insulting or evil as part of Hitlers characteristic- parallelly the people who viewed him a hero would attribute things they admired or deemed good as his characteristics… although, there are times were both sides were right in their judgements, hardly ever would one side concede the other side might be right in any manner.

Therefore the atheist who viewed Hitler as Dr. Doom incarnate  would claim Hitler was a devout Christian, and the right wing American who despised Hitler of course knew Hitler was a gun grabber just like the modern day libs he hated so much. The multi-racialist who adored Hitler would say: when Hitler said ‘folk’, he meant ‘all races of man’, not just Germans or the Christian who adored Hitler would view him as  bonafide Knights Templar spreading the word of god almighty himself.

So who was this man then? Can I even try to tackle that question without exposing my own bias? Who knows?

But what I do know is that of the long list of misnomers, I am aware of a few answers and a few logical fallacies…and while i may not be the foremost authority of all things Hitler I’d be willing to bet I know a thing or two Joe Public might not know.

Of the long list of contradictions listed, some of them are so far-fetched from reality that it is not even worth expanding on here, others, I truly am in no position to know, as is anyone really for that matter…but there are a few things that are on the list that I do feel can be explained and/or proven…. For instance:



Hitler was a sociopath


Well at least according to Walter Charles Langer, and repeated by many others… I am sure Langer went through the same pains I have to try to recognize and eliminate bias on the matter, or are we to believe someone of Jewish ancestry would have no bias to reconcile with dealing with the topic of the worlds biggest Jew-hater?

Sure it’s feasible…I mean aren’t all animal loving, vegetarian, artists  stone cold remorseless murders?

When looking up the symptoms of psychopathy it is very easy to see that there are points in one’s life when you could show each and every ‘symptom’ of being a sociopath. That aside, why label someone a sociopath? And why the need to repeat it by many others? because, clearly, it diminishes the person: hey look this guy, all the things he believed, said, and did, he was just a mental defect man… just a case of crazy nothing else to see here…move along now. Sooo, good luck now trying to paint a fuller picture of this Hitler guy to someone who looks at him like Charlie Manson soundbites.

All the people that have deemed Hitler evil of course need to believe he is crazy in some way or a product of the devil, it’s either one or the other with folks around here….. Because you see I am sane and good, and I hate the idea of Hitler, so of course If I am sane and good he must be crazy and evil! Simple math you see…

The reality being: Hitler has shown many moments in his life where he completely contradicts Langer’s diagnosis and he has shown times where he fits the symptoms-I have had moments in my life where I completely contradict the definition of a sociopath and I have I had times in my life where I embrace the symptoms-YOU have had moments in your life where… etc

Now the reality of a real live sociopath vs the conditions just being junk science is another topic. But as far as Hitler is concerned it is just simply repeated and promoted merely in slanderous intent.


Hitler was a Jew!

Oh you didn’t know?

To the person not familiar with the Jewish/Zionist world conspiracy internet scene this might seem like a laughable statement, but make no mistake this is a hot button topic that has had many a blog and forum wars started in that little corner of the internet.

The plot also thickens, because not only is Adolf a Jew but a Rothschild! And from there the rabbit hole keeps going…He planned WW2 to give the bankers power and so on… I’ll avoid falling into that abyss people call a rabbit hole and just scratch the surface with Hitler’s Jewishness or lack-thereof.

The claim: Hitler’s grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber was knocked up by Baron Rothschild while she was working as a maid at his house.

If we have learned anything from our beloved Arnold Schwarzenegger, it is that the help does sometimes come with extra ‘benefits’… Could this be the case with miss Schickgruber and lord Rothschild?

Let us look at what is concrete: no kind of physical evidence exits that implies Schickgruber worked as a maid in any Rothschild household. What exists is an eye-witness of a document. The document was a employee register manual for the country of Austria and it was allegedly in the possession of Engelbert Dollfuss, the Austrian dictator that was assassinated by Nazi sympathizers… So who is this eye-witness? Well a top level Gestapo of course… by the name of Hansjurgen Koehler… not ringing a bell to any of you WW2 hobby historians? Maybe because it’s a pseudonym! Yes the “high ranking Gestapo officer” so and so was no more than an anonymous author first published in the Manchester News Guardian in 1939! And this is the meat and potatoes of the Hitler was a Rothschild theory! People being so sure of something based off of what? That? Really?

In the spirt of what Nietzsche said Anyone who has declared someone else to be an idiot, a bad apple, is annoyed when it turns out in the end that he isn’t.”

You are still not convinced-of course the Rothschild theory is flimsy, it is there to distract from the real Jewish lineage of Hitler : the Frankenberger connection!

Hans Frank, Reich lawyer, investigated threats made by Hitler’s  nephew, William Patrick Hitler, born in England, William found himself in Germany conveniently around the time his uncle came to power…Long story short William wanted better positions then he was given, so he resorted to extortion…fled Germany…allegedly worked for the Brits, went back to Germany only to flee again…Joined the American military against Hitler… So yeah…no agenda there…  Frank reviewed letters, that were told to him by William to be extortion attempts by grandma Hitler to pay for her bastard child from Mr. Frankenberger. So of course these letters exist, right? No…. Well then there must be some document showing she worked for a Mr. Frankenberger.. since according to the  Rothschild conspiracy Grandma Hitler (in Vienna mind you) had to be documented because it was Austrian law! So even tho not in Vienna, Graz still being in Austria there must be documents! Nope…not a sliver, not only of grandma Hitler’s job title, but of this Frankenberger character at all! In fact even more so it is said that Jews were expelled from Graz in that time and place anyways!

Still the person who views “Jews” or “Zionists” as ‘bad,’ and also views Hitler to be ‘bad’ can use the paragraphs of non-existent evidence I have just written on to connect the dots to figure out the truth: Hitler was reptilian Jew hell bent on killing everyone in the name of banking!

Yes indeedy

Something I have seen from people on both sides of the fence when it comes to Hitler villain or hero question is the argument over what if any region was Hitler?

More to the point :

Hitler was Christian

Or so some would say…

Those fans of Hitler who fancy themselves Christian will tell you Hitler was a christian crusader fighting godless Bolshevism-the people who hate Hitler and fancy themselves atheist will tell you how he was in fact a Christian and he is a prime example of the evil results of organized religion.

So what is it?

It depends on what Hitler we ask, Public Hitler or Private Hitler… Fuck it lets ask bot,h this blog post is far too drawn out as is:

So Hitlers can we once and for all know what do you think of Christianity?

Public Hitler: “The National Socialist State professes its allegiance to positive Christianity. It will be its honest endeavour to protect both the great Christian Confessions in their rights, to secure them from interference with their doctrines (Lehren ), and in their duties to constitute a harmony with the views and the exigencies of the State of to-day.”

Private Hitler:“Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.”

Public Hitler:”This Winter Help Work is also in the deepest sense a Christian work. When I see, as I so often do, poorly clad girls collecting with such infinite patience in order to care for those who are suffering from the cold while they themselves are shivering with cold, then I have the feeling that they are all apostles of a Christianity– and in truth of a Christianity which can say with greater right than any other: This is the Christianity of an honest confession, for behind it stand not words but deeds.”

Private Hitler: The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science. Religion will have to make more and more concessions. Gradually the myths crumble. All that’s left is to prove that in nature there is no frontier between the organic and the inorganic. When understanding of the universe has become widespread, when the majority of men know that the stars are not sources of light but worlds, perhaps inhabited worlds like ours, then the Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity.”

You get the point…

Now this is left up to one to decide for themselves, which Hitler is closest to the real Hitler Public Hitler speaking to a Christian mass of people or Private Hitler amongst his confidants.

I for one will lean towards Private Hitler being more accurate, in fact personally from what i have read it would seem if one was forced to religiously classify Hitler he would have to be labeled an agnostic deist.

If Private Hitler is not enough how about Private Goebbels: Goebbels wrote in 1941 that Hitler “hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity“.

Or what was thought to his elite guard the SS:

As Private Hitler knew: “I have six divisions of SS composed of men absolutely indifferent in matters of religion. It doesn’t prevent them from going to their deaths with serenity in their souls.”

Everything from their social Darwin merit based societies to their official state supported institutions clearly show a slow loosening of the hold the Christian religion had on Germans.

While growing up I had often heard many of the greats of ancient Rome and Greece were homosexuals, so I took it at face value, not till years later when I started dissecting books on these people did I come to find that these people deemed gay, or whatever usually are done so at the slanderous writings, and gossip mongering of their enemies! And not until you have taken the time to find a decent historian who will put things into context buy supplying the quote and warning the reader of the possible motive of the quotee.

Same can be said in the accusations of Hitler’s Homosexuality claims…of course no evidence exits, just slander of connecting dots of : well there were gays in the party so Hitler must be one as well…never mind the quite possible fact he cuckolded his own propaganda minister… Oh Magda, who could blame you…

Probably the two most often brought up misnomers of Hitler is: Hitlers aggressive war started the 2nd world war and that Hitler ordered the systematic killing of Jewish peoples among others.

Hitler was in fact aggressive with Czechoslovakia and Poland, but that is not to say these countries were blameless. After Germany surrendered in WW2 the winners made quick work of rubbing the German public’s nose in the ground, fast forward some years and it was Germany’s turn for pay back…reclaiming territories in both countries that were prominently German and once recognized as German lands.

After Czechoslovakia, and Austria, Hitler was high on his own fumes, so much so that he had the media downplay Polish atrocities of Germans in the Danzig for the hope he would claim the lands without firing a shot as he had done before, but much like the story of Icarus, Hitler kept going and going until the sun burned him; Poland would not give up the land without a fight, so the atrocities stories went to front page press and Germany obliged Poland’s war fervor, and the UK and France jumped in and the rest is History.

From the German perspective it is easy to see Poland, France and the U.K as the aggressors and vice-versa from the allied side, it is easy to see Germany as the aggressor… The Allies won, therefore, Hitler was the aggressor and the Allies did everything they could to avoid war… Who was it that said “History is written by the victors”?

Now the dreaded Holocaust… all throughout the internet you can find sites and blogs that claim gas chambers never existed, and even seemingly outlandish claims of concentration camps being nothing more than summer time fun camps made to protect the Jews from the harsh realities of war… The only thing I can say about the official holocaust story is: if American murder detectives were to treat it as a murder case, they would have to let Mr. Holocaust walk free because of lack of evidence. There is no need for me at the moment to go on about the sham of the Nuremberg trials, the torture of defendants, or the scrupulous person who divulged the tale of 6 million dead, most by gassing, or that gas chambers were built up after the war and so on.  But once again, using what actual hard evidence we have, we can say Hitler never ordered the systematic killing of Jews, but what we do see is Jews being executed in camps, and on the Eastern front.

According to historian David Irving, Himmler knew of the murders of civilians, and specifically numbers of Jews executed to (learned through British intercepts) that Himmler had told  certain high ranking officials not to say anything to the Fuhrer about such activities. I have yet to read the intercepts in question, I guess we will have to wait till Irving’s book on Himmler comes out, which should be sometime this year until we can make solid judgment on the question, regardless, like many of the claims much of the Holocaust story seems to be just that: a story. With whatever amount of truth involved spun to weave a larger web of lies.

With all things context is needed, especially in the case of historical issues, and we as a people, are quick to jump to one extreme or another, everything must be black or white and fuck the grey! But I am here to simply say a large sea of grey exists and I believe most of the answers we seek lay in there.

Despite if you think Hitler was a hero, a villain, or just another politician what is most important to understand is that you have been lied to, and not only has the system purposely lied to you in some cases, but you have lied to yourself when whatever package they sold you fit right into your worldview (also sold to you by them) and you ran with it because it fit so perfectly into your box, but you didn’t look at it long enough to realize they had chipped away at the edges of fact, lacquered it up to cover the deceit and packaged it perfectly so that it would fit in your box without any difficulty.

I started this post off saying: Mein Kampf would always hold a special place in my heart because it helped me realize the magnitude of lies I had been told, but it did not stop there, it made me wonder: what else have I been lied to about? And I have spent the rest of my life finding out here and there what-else they have lied to me about, and damn that list just keeps growing.

Whatever your catalyst was I say: happy hunting as you seek that ever elusive beast truth.




The Selected Works of Kim Il Sung

The Selected Works of Kim Il Sung is a collection of speeches, essays, and interviews by the first leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea  (North Korea).

Kim Il Sung  is often referred to as the “Great Leader“, among North Koreans. After Stalin, with reportedly little resistance, took control of Pyongyang from the Japanese Kim Il Sung was placed in control;  the birth of Juche ideology N. Korea was the result of Kim Il Sung’s reign.

The selected works starts with an essay from 1946, on the establishment of the party.

Some excepts from Sung’s 1946 essay entitled: On the establishment of the Workers’ Party of North Korea and the question of founding the Workers’ Party of South Korea

With his opening sentence Kim IL Sung makes it clear, what is being formulated in North Korea is not simply Communism, but rather a fusion ; essentially a Korean flavored Communism.

” The foundation of the Workers Party representing and defending the interests of the labouring masses of Korea through the merger of the Communist Party and the New Democratic Party is the greatest event in the political life of our people at the present time.”

He goes on to reinforce the claim of the Party being truly a people’s party by pointing out the fact that the majority of the people who made up the People’s committee membership were in fact of the peasant class.

“The composition of the people’s committee membership now active in north Korea is as follows: 

Workers- 5.7%

Peasants- 71.8%

Office employees(intellectuals)- 15.8%

Handicraftsmen- 3.1%

Tradesmen- 4.6%”.

Immediately after gaining control of the helm, Kim IL Sung went directly to work on reclaiming Korea from the hands of foreign imperialists and homegrown traitors:

“Last August the provisional PPCNK (People’s Committee of North Korea) proclaimed the law on the nationalization of industrial, transport and communications facilities and banks which had been owned by the Japanese imperialists, pro-Japanese elements and traitors to the nation”.

With the imperialists, individualists, and profiteers removed from the business, economics and media sectors of North korea the foucs could once again be placed on the person rather then the pursuit of capital:

“In June this year, The PPCNK promulgated the Labour Law freeing factory and office workers from harsh, colonial exploitation and introducing the 8 hour working day and a social insurance system. And a law was passed to guarantee the women social rights equal to those of the men for the first time in the history of our country.”

Sung also addresses the struggles, suppression and eventual defeat of their South Korean counter parts:

The People’s committees set up by the south Korean people immediately after liberation were not recognized and, worse still, they were dissolved and their functionaries were arrested and thrown into jail.”

” And how have the U.S. imperialists and their lackeys who are obstructing the democratic independence and sovereignty of Korea dealt and are dealing with the Communist Party of South Korea? Those villains have arrested, imprisoned and murdered large numbers  of the leading cadres and members of the Communist Party and banned its organ Haebang-ilbo.”

” See the massacre in Kwangju of last August 15! With tanks, planes, machine guns and bayonets the Yankees attacked over 1000 workers of the Hwasun Colliery who were marching towards the city of  Kwangju to attend the mass meeting in honour of the anniversary August 15, killing one and wounding 109 seriously or lightly.”

The 2nd installment in the collection is a speech from 1955 entitled: On eliminating dogmatism and formalism and establishing Juche in ideological work.

Sung starts the speech off dealing with matters of propaganda. As the Juche idea was still, at this point, a relatively newly introduced ideal there were many confusions and contradictions within the pro Juche propaganda  production.  Sung addresses the misinformed and/or flat out bad propaganda being put out by his propagandist. Some of the propagandist, according to Sung, either were misinformed about Juche, were not effective enough of hi-lighting important aspects, or were simply not using enough of the Juche philosophy in their works. One of the main focuses of Sung’s complaints was the particularly bad or non-existent pro-Nationalist propaganda. 

“Only when our people are educated in the history of their own struggle and its traditions, can their national pride be stimulated and the broad masses be aroused to the revolutionary struggle.”

“The Kwangju Student Incident, for example, was a mass struggle in which tens of thousands of Korean youths and students rose against Japanese imperialism; it played a big part in inspiring the anti-Japanese spirit in broad sections of the Korean youth. As a matter of course, we should publicize this movement widely and educate youth and students in the brave fighting spirit displayed by their forerunners. Our propaganda workers have failed to do so. Instead, Syngman Rhee has been making propaganda of this movement in his favour. This has created a false impression that the Communists disregard national traditions. What a dangerous thing! It will be impossible for us to win over the south Korean youth if we go on working in this way.”

“I noticed in a primary school that all the portraits hanging on the walls were of foreigners such as Mayakovsky, Pushkin, etc., and there were none of Koreans. If children are educated in this way, how can they be expected to have national pride?”

In compelling schoolbooks, too, materials are not taken from our literary works but from foreign ones. All this is due to the lack of Juche.

The lack of Juche in propaganda work has done much harm to Party work.”

Sung had to remind his audience that Korean Communism was just that, and not that of Russia, or anyone else for that matter.

“Comrade Pak Yong Bin, on returning from the Soviet Union, said that since the Soviet Union was following the line of easing international tension, we should also drop our slogan against U.S. imperialism. Such an assertion has nothing to do with revolutionary vigilance. The U.S. imperialists scorched our land, slaughtered our innocent people en masse, and are still occupying the southern half of our country. They are our sworn enemy, aren’t they?”

” Many comrades swallow Marxism-Leninism whole, instead of digesting and assimilating it. It is therefore self-evident that they are unable to display revolutionary initiative.”

” Every effort should be made to unearth our national legacies and carry them forward. True, we should be active in learning from what is progressive internationally. But we should develop fine things of our own while introducing advanced culture. Otherwise, our people will lose faith in their own ability and become a spineless people who only try to copy from others.”

Next in the collection of Sung are transcripts from a press conference with Iraqi media in 1971. Many of the questions dealing with their relationship with Iraq, Socialism and the state of imperialism.

Speaking about the need for cooperation not globalism:

“By establishing Juche and relying on our own efforts we do not mean on any account building .’Socialism in isolation. We fully recognize that it is necessary for states to supply each other’s needs and cooperate with each other, and are striving to expand and develop it. Our position is that mutual cooperation between states should be conducted on the basis of the building of an independent national economy in each country. This alone makes it possible to expand and develop economic cooperation between states on the principles of complete equality and mutual benefit.”

“QUESTION : The relations between the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Iraq were established already long ago. However, it was only after the July 17, 1968 Revolution that the relations took a decisive turn.

What is your appraisal of the successes attained by the Iraqi people in two years after the Revolution and, particularly, the solution of the Kurd national problem on a peaceful and democratic basis and of its influence upon the strengthening of the anti-imperialist people’s front?


The Iraqi people attained national independence through their protracted arduous struggle against the domination of foreign imperialism and took the road of new development particularly after the July 17, 1968 Revolution. This was not only a great victory of the Iraqi people but a common victory of the peoples who have risen in the anti-imperialist, national-liberation struggle and a heavy blow to the imperialists and colonialists.

Since the Revolution the Iraqi people, holding aloft the banner of anti-imperialism and independence, have unfolded a devoted struggle to consolidate national independence and build a new, prosperous Iraq and have achieved great successes in a short span of time.

Many difficulties confronted the Iraqi people who set out on the road of struggle for building a new life. The imperialists headed by U.S. imperialism and the Israeli aggressors and their accomplices, the reactionary forces at home, resorted to every underhand scheme to wrest the Iraqi people from the anti-imperialist front.”

On the relationship between the 2 countries:

” The Korean people value the experience accumulated by the Iraqi people in the struggle against imperialism and the Israeli aggressors and for unity, freedom and socialism under the leadership of the Arab Baath Socialist Party.”

On the question of Palestine:

“Our people’s solidarity with and support and encouragement to the Arab people’s revolutionary struggle are constant. The Korean people will continue to resolutely support the valiant struggle of the Palestinian people for liberating their fatherland and the struggle of the entire Arab people against Zionism and imperialist aggression and will always remain a close comrade-in-arms of the Arab people in the struggle against the common enemy. Our people will render active support and encouragement to the righteous struggle of the Arab people at all times.”

Following the transcript from the Iraqi Journalist question answer session is the speech from 1986 entitled :For the Development of the Non-Aligned Movement

In the speech Sung focuses on what the non-aligned movement is about, and what they should be striving to achieve. The speech is separated into 6 major subjects:


“Imperialism is the product of aggression and plunder, and it has grown fat on ceaseless aggression and plunder. Since the emergence of imperialism mankind has suffered disasters of recurrent aggression and war, and has been deprived of immeasurable amounts of property, wealth and the fruit of labour.”

“As monopoly capital grows, so its tentacles of aggression and plunder are extended overseas. This is an inevitable outcome and a law of the development of capitalism”

“The method of its aggression and plunder has changed with the progress of time. Today the imperialists are employing mainly neocolonialism to invade, dominate and plunder other countries.”

“By entangling many developing countries in the neocolonialist web of so-called “aid” and “cooperation”, the imperialists now have seized the economic lifelines of these countries, made them nothing more than their sources of raw materials and their markets and grown rich by squeezing tremendous amounts of profit out of them.”

“The imperialists are working towards invading and dominating other countries in every possible way and in different fields. They are trying to invade other countries and establish political domination over them by resorting to military force and underhanded methods.They are also scheming to subordinate them economically and infiltrate them ideologically and culturally by means of surplus goods, unfair economic relations, decadent Western culture and bourgeois way of life.”


“To dominate the world by force, wielding nuclear weapons, is the world strategy which the imperialists have persisted in since the Second World War. The danger from this strategy is growing as the days go by.”

“In order to abolish nuclear weapons and prevent a nuclear war, we must create nuclear-free, peace zones in many regions of the world and extend them all the time.”

“The Government of our Republic and the Korean people will struggle energetically to make the Korean peninsula and the rest of Northeast Asia a nuclear-free, peace zone and, in unity with the peace-loving people of the world, make every effort to create and expand these zones in other parts of the world.”

“we must fight against the imperialist policy of military blocs and of increasing military bases.”


“Under the active aegis of the imperialists, the South African racists and Israeli Zionists overtly pursue the racist and expansionist policy of aggression in all-out opposition to the cause of national liberation.”

“In order to realize their ambition to establish a “Great Zionist Empire” in the Middle East, the Israeli Zionists have occupied Arab lands and are pursuing the policy of establishing colonies. Under the active patronage of the imperialists they are flagrantly violating the national rights of the Palestinian and other Arab people, growing more blatantly ferocious and arrogant as each day passes.”

“First, we must intensify together the struggle to put an end to the racist system of South Africa.South Africa is a major stronghold of colonialism. South African racism is the cruellest form of colonialism. It is the major obstacle to the complete liberation and decolonialization of Africa. It is clear that without putting an end to the policy of apartheid in South Africa it would be impossible to accomplish the cause of national liberation, stabilize the situation in this area and defend world peace and security.”

“Second, we must foil the expansionist, aggressive schemes of the Israeli Zionists.Zionism is a form of racism and colonialism. The aggressive, expansionist policy of the Israeli Zionists is the main factor obstructing the triumphant advance of the cause of national liberation in the Middle East. Without thwarting Israel’s aggressive schemes it would be impossible for the Middle-East countries to achieve their independence, territorial integrity and progress nor would it be possible to guarantee lasting world peace and security.”

“The non-aligned countries must strongly denounce the criminal acts perpetrated by the Israeli Zionists in their opposition to the Arab people and in their efforts to destroy the liberation cause of the Palestinian people. They must continue to extend active support and solidarity to the Palestinian and Arab peoples in their just cause. They should regard the struggle of the Palestinian and other Arab people as their common cause and take strong joint action to reject Israel in the fields of diplomacy, economy, military affairs, culture and marine and air transport in accordance with the decision of the 7th Summit Conference of Non-aligned Nations.”

“The United States must stop giving the Israeli Zionists political and diplomatic support and military and economic aid, take their hands off the Middle East and discard their ambition for dominating this region.”

“Third, we must strengthen solidarity with those people who are fighting for independence, sovereignty and to build a new society.”


“South-South cooperation is a noble way for the developing countries to strengthen their economic independence and achieve complete economic freedom through close economic and technical cooperation.”

The non-aligned and developing countries must also cooperate closely with each other in their efforts to improve the farming method.The most important way to increase grain production in the developing countries is to improve the farming method and grow crops scientifically and technologically. Improving the farming method alone will mean a great increase in agricultural production even though a large investment is not required.The developing countries must create a new farming method that suits the topographical and climatic conditions of every zone and country and must make the good experience gained in this improvement widely known.The non-aligned and developing countries must establish wide cooperation and exchange with each other in the field of seed selection and production.Those countries whose technology and experience are good in this field must supply the technology on seed selection and production to other developing countries and provide progenitors where needed.In order to increase grain production, it is necessary to intensify joint study and mutual cooperation in the field of agricultural science.The non-aligned and developing countries must start a joint venture in agriculture.”

“A joint venture in agriculture is one reasonable way for the developing countries, including the African countries, to solve the food problem. If they undertake an extensive agricultural joint venture the developing countries will not only be able to save the people from starvation by a rapid increase in agricultural production but also strengthen the foundations of agricultural production.”

“Establishing a Global System of Trade Preferences between developing countries is of great importance in the improvement of trade among these countries. The non-aligned and developing countries must make joint efforts to introduce this system as early as possible.”


“Relying as ever on the old international economic order, the imperialists are plundering the developing countries of their natural resources and paying only a pittance for the results of the peoples’ labour and obstructing the economic development of these countries. Protective trade and the high-interest policy pursued by the developed countries along with the continually worsening terms of trade and the massive increase in foreign debts of the developing countries are having a serious effect on the social and economic development of the non-aligned and developing countries. Because of the unfair international economic order, the economies of the developing countries are growing weaker and becoming stagnant. The economic situation in the African countries in particular is worsening.”

“In reality, without abolishing the old economic order, the product of the colonial system and the lever of imperialist exploitation and plunder, it will be impossible for the non-aligned and developing countries to free themselves from international exploitation and plunder and then develop.”

“At present a non-equivalent exchange is being made as ever in trade between the developing countries and the developed countries. The developing countries sell raw materials at low prices and buy manufactured goods at exorbitant prices, and the share that manufactured goods make up in the exports of these countries is decreasing continually. The result is that the trade deficit of the developing countries is increasing all the time and their economic difficulties are becoming more serious.”


“The non-aligned movement is a powerful independent force of our times which is opposed to imperialism. Only when this movement is strengthened will it be possible to succeed in repelling all forms of imperialist domination and subjugation, aggression and intervention, defend the sovereignty of the non-aligned countries and settle not only the problem of establishing a new international economic order but also all other issues in the international arena in accordance with the aspirations and desire of the peoples of the newly-emergent countries for independence. And it also makes it possible to prevent a nuclear war, defend universal peace and security and give a strong impetus to the cause of national liberation.”

The Selected Works of Kim IL Sung comes to a close with a speech from 1991 entitled: For a Free and Peaceful New World.

In this speech, Sung pontificates on his “new world” vision, a reunification of Korea, nuclear disarmament among other things.

“In order to build the new world aspired to by mankind, it is necessary to abolish the unequal old international order in all fields of politics, the economy and culture and establish an equitable new international order. There are large and small countries in the world, but there cannot be major and minor countries; there are developed nations and less developed nations, but there cannot be nations destined to dominate other nations or those destined to be dominated. All countries and nations are qual members of the international community and as such have the right to independence and equality. No privilege and no arbitrariness should be tolerated in international relations; friendship and cooperation among countries must be fully developed on the principles of mutual resect, non-interference in the affairs of other countries, equality and mutual benefit.”

“Disarmament and the abolition of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction is the most pressing task in ensuring peace. The large stockpile of nuclear weapons now on Earth is a menace to the survival of mankind itself. It is intolerable that the valuable results of science and technology created by mankind and social wealth be used for the production of the means of aggression and war that threaten man’s survival, and not for the well-being and development of humanity. The testing and production of nuclear weapons must be banned, the number of existing nuclear weapons must be reduced and, then, nuclear weapons must be completely abolished.”

“The political philosophy of our state is the Juche idea which requires that all consideration should be centred on man and that everything should be made to serve him. By fighting in single-hearted unity under the banner of the Juche idea our people have been able to build, even under the most difficult conditions and circumstances, man-centred socialism in which the people are the genuine masters of the society and everything in society serves them. the democratic character of our society finds clear expression in the fact that all the people, as the masters of the state, equally enjoy a sound and stable life in its material and cultural aspects, exercising completely equal political rights and that, on the basis of comradely love and obligation, they work together for a common goal and develop together, helping one another and leading one another forward.”

Reunifying Korea is the vital requirement of our nation; it is an important question in international politics.The Korean people are a homogenous nation that has lived on the same territory generation after generation, a nation celebrated for its long history and fine cultural traditions. There is no internal cause for our nation to live divided. Ours was not a defeated country in the Second World War; our people contributed to destroying fascism through their long-drawn-out national-liberation struggle. In spite of this, after the war our country was divided into north and south, contrary to the will of the Korean nation, and the nation is still divided. This is not only a source of untold misfortune and sufferingfor our nation bt also a cause of the unstable and dangerous situation in the Asian region. Both from the point of view of national independence and of the cause of peace in Asia and the rest of the world, the question of Korea’s reunification requires an immediate settlement.”

“we consistently maintain the three principles of independence, peaceful reunification and great national unity which the north and the south agreed upon and jointly declared; we hold that on these principles the country should be reunified by founding a confederacy based on one nation, one state, two systems and two governments.”


Unfortunately, Selected works of Kim IL Sung is not a  great source for understanding Juche ideology philosophy, but does give insight to the beliefs of Kim IL Sung and thus a broader understanding of Juche, and the goals of the North Korean government.


With on the topic of North Korea, enjoy a North Korean propaganda flick about American and internationalist propaganda.


Panzram: A Journal of Murder

The first time I saw the name “Carl Panzram“, was when it was attached to the quote : “I wish you all(humanity) had one neck and that I had my hands on it.”  After reading that dandy of a line I knew I had to learn more about Panzram. Who was he? What made him hate life, humanity and himself?

Having  heard the names and stories of most of the (in)famous “serial killers” before, I figured there couldn’t be much about Panzram that could top a Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez, or any other known mass killer… Boy, was I wrong… Carl Panzram’s story goes much deeper then simple brutality, or mental deviance; Panzram was in fact a living lesson to be taught to all who had the misfortune of being stuck in a dark alley alone with him. His life was the purest example of: cause and effect. The hypocrisies of  modern civilization and dogmatic religions all came to a head in the life of Panzram. Through an education in life’s harsh realities from a very young age Panzram quickly came to grips with the starkness of his existence; “This lesson I was taught by others: Might makes Right” 

“In my lifetime I have murdered 21 human beings, I have committed thousands of burglaries, robberies, larcenies, arsons and, last but not least, I have committed sodomy on more than 1,000 male human beings. For all these things I am not in the least bit sorry. I have no conscience so that does not worry me. I don’t believe in man, God nor Devil. I hate the  whole damned human race including myself.”

A bit  nihilistic to say the least, but, to be fair, when Panzram was not raping, robbing or killing, he was sleeping. 🙂

But really he did make one friend in life(who he also threatened to kill if he had ever made the mistake of turning his back to Panzram again), and that is how we know the story of Carl Panzram. 

Carl was befriended by a young prison guard, by the name of  Henry Lesser. Lesser convinced Panzram to write an autobiography of his life. And thus we have: Panzram: A Journal of Murder. A book containing narration from the books authors and first hand accounts of Carl’s life through his writings in prison while awaiting the noose.


Panzram was born into a large family (typical of the time) on a small farm in Minnesota on June 28, 1891 to parents of German decent; he describes them as: hardworking, ignorant and poor. By the time Panzram was 8 his parents had split up, leaving his mother to raise 6 kids on an small worked out farm. Already a liar and thief, from the start Panzram showed a natural difference from the rest of his family who were honest and hardworking according to him.

Despite his juvenile antics Panzram still found himself put to work in the fields, after school, helping out with the family, till the late hours of the evening, it was around this time that he started to question his life, and the people that surrounded him:

“My portion of pay consisted of plenty of work and a sound beating every time I looked cock-eyed or done anything that displeased anyone who was older and stronger and able to catch me and kick me around whenever they felt like it, and it seemed to me and still does now that everything was always right for the one who was the strongest and every single thing I done was wrong…Everybody thought it was all right to deceive me, lie to me and kick me whenever they felt like it, and they felt like it pretty regular, That was the way my life was lived untill I was about 11 years old.”

It was around that time that Panzram decided leave town and create his own destiny. So a 11 year old Panzram hit the road, but not before he broke into his neighbors house and stole some food and a pistol for his journey. unfortunately for a young Panzram(and over 1000 other people), his journey was cut short:

“I was caught brought back home and beaten half to death, then sent to jail and from there to the Minnesota State Training School at Red Wing Minnesota. Right there and then I began to learn about man’s inhumanity to man”

The Christian methods used at Minnesota Training School were  nothing new to a 12 year old Carl:

“There during my 2 years I was trained by 2 different sets of people to have 2 different set of morals. The good people tried to train me to be good and the bad people did train me to be bad. The method that the good people used in training me was to beat goodness into me and all the badness out of me…The more they beat me and whipped me the more I hated them and their damn religion.”

And when the usual ass beating was not sufficient enough, the training school clergy men had more creative ways of getting their point across:

“They had various methods of punishing us for doing wrong and teaching us to do right,The most popular with them was to take us to the ‘paint shop’, so called because there they used to paint our bodies black and blue…The paint shop was a very ingenious contrivance for inflicting the worst punishment where it would do the least harm and the most good. They used to have a large wooden block which we were bent over and tied face downward after first being striped naked. Then a large towel was soaked in salt water and spread on our backs from the shoulders to the knees. Then the man who was to do the whipping took a large strap about 1/4 of an inch thick by 4 inches wide and about 2 feet long. This strap had a lot of little round holes punched through it. Every time the whip came down on the body the skin would come up through these little holes in the strap and after 25 or 30 times of this, little blisters would form and then burst, and right there and then hell began. The salt water would do the rest. About a week or two later a boy might be able to sit down. I used to get this racket regularly, and when I was too ill for that sort of medicine, they used to make a smaller strap and beat me on my open palms and hands.”

To be fair, not everything was beatings and blisters for young Carl, there was also room for good Christian love… You know that kind of special love, that they proclaim to hate but obsess about it constantly and are always willing to give the most detailed descriptions of said reputed acts:

“This Mr. Moore was a christian, very much so. I was taught to pray when I got out of bed every morning, to say grace at each meal and give thanks to the lord after it…He examined my penis and rectum, asking me if I had ever committed fornication or sodomy or had ever had sodomy committed on me… He explained in detail and very thoroughly just what he meant by these things. That began my education. I have learned little more since.”

“I had learned that a boy’s penis could be used for something besides to urinate with and that a rectum could be used for other purposes than crepitating. Oh yes, I had learned a hell of a lot from my expert instructors…”

Even at his very young age Panzram displayed the testicular fortitude to not simply become a victim, but rather a reaper of vengeance; as he burned down the “paint shop” where he was so often beaten, and tried to poison (with rat poison placed in food) Mr. Moore who had continually beaten the pre-adolescent Carl. 

After serving 2 years there, upon his release Carl Panzram had found his way in life:

“When I got out of there I knew all about Jesus and the Bible- so much so that I knew it was all a lot of hot air. But that wasn’t all I knew. I had been taught by Christians how to be a hypocrite and had learned more about stealing, lying, hating, burning and killing”

“From the treatment I received while there and the lessons I learned from it, I had fully decided when I left there just how to live my life. I made up my mind that I would rob, burn, destroy, and kill everywhere I went and everybody I could as long as I lived. That’s the way i was reformed in the Minnesota State Training School.” 

After leaving the training school and getting into turmoil with a local preacher/teacher who had a touch of the beatyourassites as well, Carl decided to do what was a common act for many people looking for a new beginning; find an open door on a passing train and hitch a ride. As if a young Panzram did not already have his fill of bad experiences… He ends up in a box car with “4 burly bums”, after he (Carl) invited them on… The bums repaid the young teenage Panzram for his good deed by taking their turns sodomizing him:

” I left that box car a sadder, sicker but wiser boy than I was when I entered it.”


Needless to say, his dirty box car lovin was the final straw… Carl Panzram would become a teacher of all the lessons he had so brutality had to learn in his life; a human mirror reflecting back all the torture, misery, rape, hypocrisy, and hate on to who ever was unlucky enough to be standing in front of him.

Carl ended up doing another 2 years in  Montana institution for petty-larceny. At the age of 16, in order to enlist in the military Panzram lied about his age…He lasted about 2 months before getting 3 years in military prison for a number of offences ranging anywhere from disobeying orders to stealing merchandise:

” I got 3 years in the U.S. Military Prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. My General Court Martial or trial was held at Fort William Henry Harrison, Helena, Montana, and my court proceedings were reviewed by the then Secretary of War, Mr. William Howard Taft. He recommended me for 3 years… 13 years later I had the very good fortune to rob him out of about 40,000 worth of jewelry and Liberty Bonds. This happened at his home in New Haven, Connecticut, in the summer of 1920.”

“I was discharged from that prison in 1910. I was the spirit of meanness personified. I had not at this time got so that I hated myself. I only hated everybody else.”

Carl almost had a non-existence relationship with women, and the few experiences he did have were plagued with trouble. That topped with his upbringing of boys homes, perverted priests, beatings and rape he quickly came to the conclusion that women were too much trouble, as he explains after a night with a women which we woke up to robbed and with a strange burning in his loins…And not burning in a yearning way, but in a bitch gave me gonorrhea way:

“I began to suspect that ladies were a very good thing to leave alone. I have followed that policy pretty closely ever since. Once in awhile since then one would get her claws into me, but not while I was sober or in the daytime where I could see’em first.”

While, women, seemed like bad idea for Panzram, sodomy on the other hand seemed like a great idea, after all he claims over 1000 males had been sodomized by him; he’s like the Wilt Chamberlain of butt rape. The first time he speaks of forcible rape of another man is when he and a Indian (long story) are walking back from the Mexican border and they run into a poor sap, who they rob and tie up:

” I figured that while I had such a good chance as that, I would commit a little sodomy on him. This I proceeded to do. Then I invited the Indian to take a ride but the damn fool was only an Indian. He hadn’t received the full benefits of civilization yet like I had, so he declined the honor.”

A bit of sarcastic humor is shown by Panzram when he states the Indian didn’t have same same benefits of “civilization” as Panzram. 

But as Panzram put it, he was quite the booty bandit, while doing time in Prison,after prison he made sure his supply of sodomy stayed full:

( while in prison in deer lodge Montana) “At that place in time I got to be an experienced wolf. I knew more about sodomy than old boy Oscar Wilde ever thought of knowing. I would start the morning with sodomy…”

Panzram’s rape mania was not limited to solely men, but anyone, be they child or man as he explained during his time in Angola:

“While I was sitting there, a little nigger boy around 11 or 12 years old came bumming around. He was looking for something. He found it too. I took him out to a gravel pit about 1/4 mile from the main camp of the Sinclair oil company at Luanda. I left him there, but first committed sodomy on him and then killed him. His brains were coming out of his ears when I left him.”

 For having raped over 1000 people, his official death toll at 21seems a bit disproportional. But when taken into account his relativity short life was spent mostly inside prison walls it seems to make a little more sense.

“I have no desire whatever to reform myself. My only desire is to reform people who try to reform me. And I believe that the only way to reform people is to kill ’em.” 

Meanwhile speaking of Panzram and murder, back in Angola:

“I hired a canoe and 6 niggers and went out hunting in the bay and backwaters. I was looking for crocodiles. I found them, plenty. They were all hungry. I fed them. I shot all 6 of these niggers and dumped them in. The crocks done the rest.”

Panzram recounts his murders as causally as one would expect him to.

With money he had gotten from robbing Taft’s house he purchased a yacht, which started his travels to Europe, Africa then back to America, on the boy he describes how he used to murder ship-hands that he would pick up:

“There we would go to wine and dine and when they were drunk enough they would go to bed. When they were asleep I would get my .45 Colt Army Automatic, this I stole from Mr. Taft’s home, and blow their brains out. Then I would take a rope and tie a rock on them and put them in my rowboat, row out in the main channel about one mile and drop em over board. They are there yet, ten of em.”                                                                                                                                                                                                         

Panzram was not only concerned with  individual murders, but had plans of mass death:

“My whole mind was bent on figuring out different ways to annoy and punish my enemies, and everybody was my enemy.”

Panzram had a few detailed plans on how to commit mass death, but all his plans hinged on getting enough money to be able to fund these ideas:

(1) he wanted to set off large bombs in a train tunnel that would also explode various gases in glass jars that would have been instant death for any person on the train.

(2) He intended on blowing up and American ship, and making look like it was the British, in order to instigate a war.

(3) he intended on making poison, enough poison to start infecting the water supply.

None of these plans ever came to fruition as he would always end up back in jail before being able to build up the resources to commit such mass acts of violence.

Panzrams life was spent in and out of prison, mainly getting caught for smaller crimes while getting away with the larger crimes. While in prison, his violence would not stop as he got into countless fights, sodomized many fellow inmates, set fires in numerous different prisons, escaped and attempted escape whenever he felt to do so. Surprisingly enough his undoing came by his own mouth. At the age of 37 he was arrested in Washington D.C. for stealing a radio out of a house. When the officer informed Panzram of his charge, Carl brushed it off and told the officer, the charge was a “joke”. When the officer further inquired why, he had thought the charge a Joke, Panzram replied that he had killed too many people to worry about the charge. Panzram, maybe in a short laps of his mission, seemingly sabotaged any chance he would have to continue his life’s quest outside of prison, as he even gave a few specific details.

1000 rapes, 21 murders, 1 friend

It was in the D.C. lock-up where Carl met his unlikely only friend. Lesser’s first encounter with Panzram as explained in the book:

“Lesser was to remember later his first awareness of something unusual in one of his prisoners. On the western side, against the setting sun that burned into a tall, dirty barred outer windows, Lesser saw the silhouette of a large man framed by a second set of bars… The young guard was affected in a way he could not explain, except to state decades later that ‘there was a kind of stillness around him, how he looked’…As lesser turned to walk away, he had a peculiar feeling. He turned to see Panzram watching him from behind the bars… ‘When is your court date’ Lesser asked casually. ‘November elventh’ Panzram said coldly. ‘Whats your racket Lesser asked smiling…’What I do is I reform people’. Lesser responded vaguely and moved away uneasily.”

Panzram, being the trouble maker he was, got himself a lot of ‘special attention’ from other prison guards, as they would beat and torture Panzram when ever they felt the need to. Lesser was horrified by what he saw being done to Panzram, and started to offer help, small talk, providing small wants to Carl. Panzram was suspicious of lesser’s friendliness at first but as time went by they became “friendly” with each other.  Lesser convinced Panzram to write his autobiography while in prison and many times supplied Panzram with the writing material to do so. 

After a trial, during which Panzram acted in his own defense, he was found guilty and sentenced to 25 years in prison to be served at Fort Leavenworth in Leavenworth, Kansas. When he arrived and was read the rules of the facility by the warden in his office, he told him ominously, “I’ll kill the first man that bothers me.” Because he was believed to be too psychotic to be with the general prison population, he was assigned a job in the prison laundry which allowed him to work alone. On June 20, 1929, Panzram took a heavy iron bar and beat his supervisor, Robert Warnke, to death in front of the other inmates and then started attacking them too. Panzram went to trial on April 14, 1930, once again acting in his own defense. After a large group of witnesses gave their testimonies, Panzram was found guilty and sentenced to death by hanging. He was  overjoyed to have received the sentence and  left the courtroom laughing .

Lesser kept in touch with Panzram through letters at that time, sending him books, and money time to time.  On the morning of September 5, 1930, Panram was brought to the prison gallows. When the executioner asked whether he had any last words, Panzram, quite infamously, told him: “Yes, hurry it up, you Hoosier bastard! I could kill 10 men while you’re fooling around!” 

 Henry Lesser, who had kept the manuscript of Panzram’s autobiography, spent the next four decades trying to find a publisher willing to print it. Because the story was thought to be too horrific, it wasn’t until 1970 that it was finally published under the title Killer: A Journal of a Murder.

As stated at the beginning of this article, Panzram’s life was a fine example of cause and effect. While sick and vengeful in his actions, Carl Panzram displayed a will and fortitude that if placed in any direction could have lead him anywhere he so chose, from greatness to infamy. He chose his path,  being a living ,breathing, grim reaper on the Earth to reform the fine people who brought him “civilization”. Every head he mashed in, and every life he ruined was the direct result of a hypocritical, perverted, careless surrounding that a young Carl was brought up in. 

Carl Panzram had the option, to just be a victim, to turn the other cheek, as he was surely taught to do so, but he choose differently. His life and his decisions go beyond simply right or wrong, The monster makers are sometimes bitten back by the monster they create, and this is the case of Carl Panzram. When a man has done such heinous acts as Carl had done, he essentially forces the spotlight on the question of his development. It is easy to make the mistake of simply writing Panzram off as a murderous maniac, and ignore the larger question of: what was the madness that created Panzram, and why is it  still allowed to exist?

The act of a single man being half decent to Panzram was enough to confuse him, and eventually win him over as a friend. It was not like lesser was out of the ordinary with his action, he was simply decent and friendly towards Panzram. Like a abused dog who runs across a nice person trying to actually feed it. First it hesitates, and is unsure, but after the dog eats enough and sees the general authenticity of the compassion, the beast is won over for life. 

Its been said by Carl and others that: Panzram hated the whole world and even hated himself, which in the end may be true. But, to take vengeance on humanity with such potency, shows he really mourned his death as a child, and deeply loved the innocence that was forever taken from him at such a young age. That is to say maybe he didn’t love what he was, but he loved what they had killed in him.

“Do you want to live forever”?

The chick from “Conan” once asked.











Hmmmmmm… I don’t know, but I wouldn’t mind a few extra centuries added on.

Seems far fetched, but, people are hard at work, today… This exact moment, as I type this, looking for ways to prolong healthy life. Gains have been made, but as of today the promise of gains outweigh the actual gains in the lab.

Ponce de León is reborn! Well, maybe not, but the magic of the story about his quest for eternal life has been. The Spanish explorer today is played by Aubrey de Grey and Ray Kurzweil. Both, of course are not the only players involved, but both are the leading faces of their respected, similar but different, approaches to strategies in expanding the human life span.

Similar in the sense, that they both seek ways to prolong life; different in the approach. Aubrey de Grey is looking for the fountain of youth inside of our bodies meanwhile Kurzweil wishes to create the fountain of youth through technology in what is called: Transhumanism.

The Aubrey de Grey Biological approach:

Aubrey de Grey is not your stereotypical scientist, which is exactly why he is at the forefront of the battle against aging. Whether it is his uncanny resemblance to Rasputin, his love of beer, or the fact he didn’t even go to school for the field he has caused such a stir in… It is abundantly clear Aubrey de Grey has been a breath of fresh air and fresh ideas to a stagnant field.

So he is a refreshing eccentric character,in the usually dull world of gerontology,  but what about his ideas.

De Grey describes a moment late into the night where the SENS idea came to him, or as he explained: “Grabbing a notepad, I jotted down the molecular and cellular changes that I could confidently list as important targets for the new class of anti-aging therapies that I would soon call SENS, the ‘Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence’.”

After coming to the conclusion, that, the fields of Gerontology and Geriatrics were plagued with issues, that make it extremely difficult to be successful in achieving any kind of worthwhile senescence, de Grey, decided to attack the issue by focusing on the moderate middle ground:

“At root, I was addressing a simple question: if geriatrics fails because prevention is better than a cure, and gerontology fails because our understanding of metabolism is so limited, then might an intermediate target be the best of both worlds? Might it be possible to repair damage after its been laid down (hence avoiding the need to understand the details of how laid down) but before it spirals out of control (hence also avoiding the losing battle that is geriatrics)?”

De Grey describes this as the “Engineering approach”:

By dealing with the middle ground…The damage de Grey proposes the problems left to deal with are only 7, rather then the countless issues involved in the Metabolism and Pathology stages, de Grey suggests we focus on the 7 stages of damge:

(1) damage: Cell loss, cell atrophy-Possible solutions– Cell therapy, mainly.

(2) damage: Junk outside cells-Possible solutions: Phagocytosis by immune stimulation.

(3) damage: Crosslinks outside cells- Possible solutions: AGE-breaking molecules/enzymes.

(4) damage: Death-resistant cells- Possible solutions: Suicide genes, immune stimulation

(5) damage: Mitochondrial mutations- Possible solutions: Allotopic expression of 13 proteins.

(6) damage: Junk inside cells- Possible solutions: Transgenic microbial enzymes.

(7) damage: Nuclear[epi] mutations (only cancer matters)- Possible solutions: Telomerase/ ATL gene deletion plus periodic stem cell reseeding.

Aubrey de Grey goes into details about the science and theories behind his SENS plan, in his book : Ending Aging

A SENS challenge was offered to anyone who could prove de Grey’s theories had no base in reality. 20 thousand dollars were put up and panel of judges, not attributed to either party, have to this day awarded no one the cash.

What de Grey believes is not just simply cracking the human code in our life time and living forever, but rather a prolonging of life, followed by another break through, and more prolonging of life on top of that and so on. This is what de Grey describes as “longevity escape velocity

“longevity escape velocity” is highly dependent on something that Kurzweil also depends on and that is the : “law of accelerating returns” , which basically means:  the rate of change in a wide variety of evolutionary systems (including but not limited to the growth of technologies) tends to increase exponentially. Which is just piggy backed off Moore’s law, which states: in the history of computing hardware whereby the number of transistors that can be placed inexpensively on an integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years.

For example, after years of research, scientists extended healthy living another 20 years, and within those extra 20 years, with technological advancements and knowledge growth, another breakthrough happens that extends healthy life by 30 years this time, and the process continues on.

De Grey likes to bring up the process of humans learning to fly…  Explaining, that it took thousands of years to figure out how to fly, but once we did figure it out, in a relatively short time, we had fighter jets and spaceships. This is how de Grey and Kurzweil think things will go in their own feilds… After the first major breakthrough, there will be many to follow in a relatively short amount of time.

Aubrey de Grey:

Aubrey de Grey VS Richard Sprott (1/6) Debate

Kurzweil and Transhumanism

From science to science fiction! Tranhumanism would seem to be science fiction,if it were not for the simple fact the ideas of Tanhumanism are very plausible. Ray Kurzweil is an inventor, author, “futurist” among many other things. His inventions aside, Kurzweil is most know for his belief in the “singularity“, which is when Humans merge with technology, kinda like the Borg from Star Trek.

Like with de Greys beliefs the steps to complete Transhumanism starts with basic steps, first we will have nanobots placed in us, which will help prolong our lives, by attacking diesse, curing inflammation, and whatever else is needed… Or how about Google in your brain? To be able to do a Google search by simply thinking to do so. The law of accelerating returns is also implied here for the continual advancement in technology.

But these amazing possiblies are not even Kurzweil’s endgame; he foresees a day when we can actually download our consciousness on to a hard drive, much like the cylons from the recent Battlestar Galactica series.

Is it even possible to be able to do such a thing? If it was it would shatter allot of peoples view of the “soul”; so we could imagine allot of concern and downright fear from many people (esp religious types) if such a thing were ever close to becoming reality.  But more-so then that, what would become of man;we would essentially stop being human, and become artificial intelligence ourselves.

Kurzweil believes many of these things will take place by 2045.









Kurzweil, all his accomplishments aside, is quite the interesting character…The more virtually real cyber life becomes the more he can build his online ego of a famous female pop star singer. What was that Weininger was saying about Jews and femininistic nature? Despite his freakness, many of the things he has predicted has come about, which leads many to believe allot of the things he is saying now will come to fruition.







Personally, call me paranoid, but I am not allowing a freaking Google chip in my head or nanobots in my body. The possibitly for the powers that be to abuse these possible inventions is just too great.

Mankind, must not be short sighted in the hunt for AI and Tranhumainsm, after Pandora’s box has been opened it might be too late. When I read books like “the singularity is near” it makes me think the “terminator scenario” is all too real.

While many questions and hesitations keep me weary of the possible singularity, the exact opposite can be said for my enthusiasm towards de Grey’s work…Call it a more natural path to longevity. The possibly of man, through the mastering of his body,and eugenics, being able to expand life span by 100’s or even 1000’s of years is quite magnificent, and, in my belief, the proper path towards Overman.

Outside of drugs, supplements, HGH, etc, what can you do to prolong your life? EAT LESS! Yes, really it’s that simple… The 20% rule, eat 20% less then you daily suggest calorie intake for your BMI. So far, that is the only clinically proven  natural method of generally prolonging your life…Always good to keep the body, a little hungry, is the rule.

Otto Weininger


“Dietrich Eckart once told me that in all his life he had known just one good Jew: Otto Weininger, who killed himself on the day when he realized that the Jew lives on the decay of peoples” Adolf Hitler (Table Talks 41-44, pg 141)

Otto Weininger was an introspective philosopher who crucified himself in his works, as he analyzed Jewishness, thus analyzing himself.  Weininger, at the young age of 23 decided (allegedly because of his inability to supersede his nature)  his only viable option was to commit suicide. So, to set the perfect ambiance, he rented the room Beethoven died in, and shot himself.

In his last major work: Sex and Character He dives into many philosophical subjects, mainly dealing with the male-female dynamic. 

The most interesting (in my opinion) part of Sex and Character, is when Weininger discusses Judaism, Jewishness, the differences between, Jews and non-Jews, and ultimately analyzing himself through his people.

The following are excerpts from the chapter entitled “Judaism” in S & C (Pg. 301-330)

“I must, however, make clear what I mean by Judaism; I mean neither a race nor a people nor a recognized creed. I think of it as a tendency of the mind, as a psychological constitution which is a possibility for all mankind, but which has become actual in the most conspicuous fashion only amongst Jews.”

Weininger, is speaking about, what is today called: the “spiritual Jew”.

The spiritual Jew, does not require Jewish genetic links, or to practice Judaism as a religion, but simply to adopt and embrace Jewish ideology and mentality, which in this case can be summed up as : modernity.  One might scoff at the idea of the spiritual Jew, and only view the issue as solely a biological matter, but that would be a costly mistake, as there are millions of genetic Jews, but billions of spiritual Jews.

The concept of the spiritual Jew, or the self-Jew, is largely ignored by the “its da jews” crowd, because it requires introspective awareness, self conflict, and eventually change in the manner of (self) evolution. While it is easy to point the finger at the idea of the Jew, it is hard to deal with the inborn Jew. Therefore, the most determining battle (within one’s self) goes largely ignored. 

“There are Aryans who are more Jewish than Jews”… I am sure many a Gentile CEO can be placed under the same banner.

“The Antisemitism of the Jews bears testimony to the fact that no one who has had experience of them considers them lovable not even the Jew himself.” 

Weininger on Jews and femininity:

“It would not be difficult to make a case for the view that the Jew is more saturated with femininity than the Aryan, to such an extent that the most manly Jew is more feminine than the lest manly Aryan. This interpretation would be erroneous. It is most important to lay stress on the agreements and differences simply because so many points that become obvious in dissecting women reappear in the Jew.”

“The true conception of the state is foreign to the Jew, because he, like the woman, is wanting in personality; his failure to grasp the idea of true society is due to his lack of a free intelligible ego.”

“As there is no real dignity in women, so what is meant by the word ‘gentleman’ does not exist amongst Jews.”

“Our age is not only the most Jewish but the most feminine.”

The femininity in the nature of Jews, has long been a topic of conversation and debate, all the way from the days of Thule style Aryans and a solar (masculine) identity and Jews, with lunar (feminism) role…All the way to today with the destruction of masculine concepts of honor, nobility,etc, for material impulsive femininity.

On Zionism:

“Zionism is the negation of Judaism, for the conception of Judaism involves a world-wide distribution of the Jews”

The next time someone wishes to parade the “Rabbis against Zionism” as some kind of virtuous characters of righteousness, they ought might want to remember Weininger’s words on the matter. As the question of Jewish statehood is a debated subject amongst some Jews, not because of the actions of the state, but rather a simple religious disagreement.

On Jews and medicine:

“The present turn of medical science is largely due to the influence of Jews…They would make it a matter of drugs, and mere administration of chemicals.”

 Big pharmaceutical, before pharmaceutical got big.

Like most introspective Jews, Otto had the fantasy that he could simply convert away his Jewishness:

“There is no more an absolute Jew than an absolute Christian.”

“I have no wish to boycott the Jew, or by any such immoral means to attempt to solve the Jewish Question.”

“To defeat Judaism, the Jew must first understand himself and war against himself. So far, the Jew has reached no further than to make and enjoy jokes against his own peculiarities.”

“Only steady resolution, united to the highest self-respect, can free the Jew from Jewishness.”

“The Jew, indeed, who has become Christian, has the fullest right to be regarded by the Aryan in his individual capacity, and no longer be condemned as belonging to a race above which his moral efforts raised him.”

Did Weininger truly believe he could battle himself, and cleanse his Jewishness? Maybe… But would his suicide then be the result of this question?

Weininger on Suicide:

 “The suicider is almost always a sadist, because he alone wants to get out of a situation and can act; a masochist must first question all eternity whether he may, should, take his own life”


It would seem Otto’s struggles with himself, his identity, and his failure to overcome himself, or convince others that he had overcome himself lead him to take his own life. Weininger allegedly wrote two letters (one to his father, and one to his brother) before he shot himself. The letters have not been made public.

 Otto Weininger was buried in theMatzleinsdorf Protestant Cemetery in Vienna. The epitaph by his father translates:

“This stone closes the resting place of a youth whose spirit never found rest on earth. And when he had made known the revelations of his spirit and of his soul, he could no longer bear to be among the living. He sought out the death precinct of one of the greatest in Vienna’s Schwarzspanier house, and there destroyed his bodily existence.”

Catechism of the Revolutionist

Sergei Nechayev did not play games when it came to revolution. His work entitled Catechism of the Revolutionist is a hard hitting piece that penetrates like a hard dick, while modernites flaccidly fumble around looking for excuses for their inactivity.

Politically it is said, Nechayev was everything from and anarchist to “Barracks communistas Marx called it. His politics are really irrelevant, what matters was and is his analysis on revolutionary activities and mindset.

What is quickly realized by the reader is: You are bluffing in your “revolt”. A hardened, focused mindset and behavior is demanded from Nechayev as he spells out the necessary steps to making the individual dedicated to Revolt.

Friends that are not fanatical revolutionist…Forget about it. That sweet girl in your class…Forget about it… The message is simple: Live, breath, kill, fuck, and die Revolution. There is nothing else.

Enjoy your heart-check:

From Chapter 2 of COTR:

The Duties of the Revolutionary toward Himself

1. The revolutionary is a doomed man. He has no personal interests, no business affairs, no emotions, no attachments, no property, and no name. Everything in him is wholly absorbed in the single thought and the single passion for revolution.

2. The revolutionary knows that in the very depths of his being, not only in words but also in deeds, he has broken all the bonds which tie him to the social order and the civilized world with all its laws, moralities, and customs, and with all its generally accepted conventions. He is their implacable enemy, and if he continues to live with them it is only in order to destroy them more speedily.

3. The revolutionary despises all doctrines and refuses to accept the mundane sciences, leaving them for future generations. He knows only one science: the science of destruction. For this reason, but only for this reason, he will study mechanics, physics, chemistry, and perhaps medicine. But all day and all night he studies the vital science of human beings, their characteristics and circumstances, and all the phenomena of the present social order. The object is perpetually the same: the surest and quickest way of destroying the whole filthy order.

4. The revolutionary despises public opinion. He despises and hates the existing social morality in all its manifestations. For him, morality is everything which contributes to the triumph of the revolution. Immoral and criminal is everything that stands in its way.

5. The revolutionary is a dedicated man, merciless toward the State and toward the educated classes; and he can expect no mercy from them. Between him and them there exists, declared or concealed, a relentless and irreconcilable war to the death. He must accustom himself to torture.

6. Tyrannical toward himself, he must be tyrannical toward others. All the gentle and enervating sentiments of kinship, love, friendship, gratitude, and even honor, must be suppressed in him and give place to the cold and single-minded passion for revolution. For him, there exists only one pleasure, on consolation, one reward, one satisfaction – the success of the revolution. Night and day he must have but one thought, one aim – merciless destruction. Striving cold-bloodedly and indefatigably toward this end, he must be prepared to destroy himself and to destroy with his own hands everything that stands in the path of the revolution.

7. The nature of the true revolutionary excludes all sentimentality, romanticism, infatuation, and exaltation. All private hatred and revenge must also be excluded. Revolutionary passion, practiced at every moment of the day until it becomes a habit, is to be employed with cold calculation. At all times, and in all places, the revolutionary must obey not his personal impulses, but only those which serve the cause of the revolution.

The Relations of the Revolutionary toward his Comrades

8. The revolutionary can have no friendship or attachment, except for those who have proved by their actions that they, like him, are dedicated to revolution. The degree of friendship, devotion and obligation toward such a comrade is determined solely by the degree of his usefulness to the cause of total revolutionary destruction.

9. It is superfluous to speak of solidarity among revolutionaries. The whole strength of revolutionary work lies in this. Comrades who possess the same revolutionary passion and understanding should, as much as possible, deliberate all important matters together and come to unanimous conclusions. When the plan is finally decided upon, then the revolutionary must rely solely on himself. In carrying out acts of destruction, each one should act alone, never running to another for advice and assistance, except when these are necessary for the furtherance of the plan.

10. All revolutionaries should have under them second- or third-degree revolutionaries – i.e., comrades who are not completely initiated. these should be regarded as part of the common revolutionary capital placed at his disposal. This capital should, of course, be spent as economically as possible in order to derive from it the greatest possible profit. The real revolutionary should regard himself as capital consecrated to the triumph of the revolution; however, he may not personally and alone dispose of that capital without the unanimous consent of the fully initiated comrades.

11. When a comrade is in danger and the question arises whether he should be saved or not saved, the decision must not be arrived at on the basis of sentiment, but solely in the interests of the revolutionary cause. Therefore, it is necessary to weigh carefully the usefulness of the comrade against the expenditure of revolutionary forces necessary to save him, and the decision must be made accordingly.

The Relations of the Revolutionary toward Society

12. The new member, having given proof of his loyalty not by words but by deeds, can be received into the society only by the unanimous agreement of all the members.

13. The revolutionary enters the world of the State, of the privileged classes, of the so-called civilization, and he lives in this world only for the purpose of bringing about its speedy and total destruction. He is not a revolutionary if he has any sympathy for this world. He should not hesitate to destroy any position, any place, or any man in this world. He must hate everyone and everything in it with an equal hatred. All the worse for him if he has any relations with parents, friends, or lovers; he is no longer a revolutionary if he is swayed by these relationships.

14. Aiming at implacable revolution, the revolutionary may and frequently must live within society will pretending to be completely different from what he really is, for he must penetrate everywhere, into all the higher and middle-classes, into the houses of commerce, the churches, and the palaces of the aristocracy, and into the worlds of the bureaucracy and literature and the military, and also into the Third Division and the Winter Palace of the Czar.

15. This filthy social order can be split up into several categories. The first category comprises those who must be condemned to death without delay. Comrades should compile a list of those to be condemned according to the relative gravity of their crimes; and the executions should be carried out according to the prepared order.

16. When a list of those who are condemned is made, and the order of execution is prepared, no private sense of outrage should be considered, nor is it necessary to pay attention to the hatred provoked by these people among the comrades or the people. Hatred and the sense of outrage may even be useful insofar as they incite the masses to revolt. It is necessary to be guided only by the relative usefulness of these executions for the sake of revolution. Above all, those who are especially inimical to the revolutionary organization must be destroyed; their violent and sudden deaths will produce the utmost panic in the government, depriving it of its will to action by removing the cleverest and most energetic supporters.

17. The second group comprises those who will be spared for the time being in order that, by a series of monstrous acts, they may drive the people into inevitable revolt.

18. The third category consists of a great many brutes in high positions, distinguished neither by their cleverness nor their energy, while enjoying riches, influence, power, and high positions by virtue of their rank. These must be exploited in every possible way; they must be implicated and embroiled in our affairs, their dirty secrets must be ferreted out, and they must be transformed into slaves. Their power, influence, and connections, their wealth and their energy, will form an inexhaustible treasure and a precious help in all our undertakings.

19. The fourth category comprises ambitious office-holders and liberals of various shades of opinion. The revolutionary must pretend to collaborate with them, blindly following them, while at the same time, prying out their secrets until they are completely in his power. They must be so compromised that there is no way out for them, and then they can be used to create disorder in the State.

20. The fifth category consists of those doctrinaires, conspirators, and revolutionists who cut a great figure on paper or in their cliques. They must be constantly driven on to make compromising declarations: as a result, the majority of them will be destroyed, while a minority will become genuine revolutionaries.

21. The sixth category is especially important: women. They can be divided into three main groups. First, those frivolous, thoughtless, and vapid women, whom we shall use as we use the third and fourth category of men. Second, women who are ardent, capable, and devoted, but whom do not belong to us because they have not yet achieved a passionless and austere revolutionary understanding; these must be used like the men of the fifth category. Finally, there are the women who are completely on our side – i.e., those who are wholly dedicated and who have accepted our program in its entirety. We should regard these women as the most valuable or our treasures; without their help, we would never succeed.

The Attitude of the Society toward the People

22. The Society has no aim other than the complete liberation and happiness of the masses – i.e., of the people who live by manual labor. Convinced that their emancipation and the achievement of this happiness can only come about as a result of an all-destroying popular revolt, the Society will use all its resources and energy toward increasing and intensifying the evils and miseries of the people until at last their patience is exhausted and they are driven to a general uprising.

23. By a revolution, the Society does not mean an orderly revolt according to the classic western model – a revolt which always stops short of attacking the rights of property and the traditional social systems of so-called civilization and morality. Until now, such a revolution has always limited itself to the overthrow of one political form in order to replace it by another, thereby attempting to bring about a so-called revolutionary state. The only form of revolution beneficial to the people is one which destroys the entire State to the roots and exterminated all the state traditions, institutions, and classes in Russia.

24. With this end in view, the Society therefore refuses to impose any new organization from above. Any future organization will doubtless work its way through the movement and life of the people; but this is a matter for future generations to decide. Our task is terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction.

25. Therefore, in drawing closer to the people, we must above all make common cause with those elements of the masses which, since the foundation of the state of Muscovy, have never ceased to protest, not only in words but in deeds, against everything directly or indirectly connected with the state: against the nobility, the bureaucracy, the clergy, the traders, and the parasitic kulaks. We must unite with the adventurous tribes of brigands, who are the only genuine revolutionaries in Russia.

26. To weld the people into one single unconquerable and all-destructive force – this is our aim, our conspiracy, and our task.

Was Mustafa Kemal “Ataturk” Jewish and/or subservient to Jewish world agenda?

Mustafa Kemal, better known as Ataturk (Father of Turks) has always been a controversial character in the eyes of the Jewish conspiracy scene. A large part of the Turkish population views Kemal as a hero, meanwhile, a large part of Jewish conspiracy scene view Ataturk as a crypto Jew or “Donmeh”.  Kemal has often been a target of ridicule both from Armenians and Muslims.

Accused of Christian genocide on one hand, and being the final nail in the coffin of the Islamic Ottoman Empire on the other. Allegedly surrounded by Jews in the hierarchy of the “Young Turk” revolution, and apparently admitting to being Jewish in private to a Jewish journalist… It would seem to be a close cut case… But as always when dealing with figures of history and political movements, things are not always what they seem.  It is time to attempt to get to the bottom of the Ataturk Question…Was he Jewish? How Jewish were the young Turks, and was Atatürk conspiring in Jewish world agenda, as he is accused of on many Jewish conspiracy sites?

Was Mustafa Kemal Jewish?

Is there any proof, Kemal was Jewish, or is the claim just regurgitated speculation and sometimes even wishful thinking from some of the parties involved in the accusation.

Let’s look at the “proof”

(1)    Kemal was born in a multi-ethnic city that had a relatively high (around 50%) Jewish population.

Mustafa was born in the city of Salonica (today known as Thessaloniki) a coastal city which had a diverse population of: Jews, Greeks, Slavs, Turks with all 3 of the major monolithic religions represented (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam). Equating someone to be Jewish, because they were born in Salonica, would be the equivalent of saying: He was born in New York….He must be Jewish! It’s stretching the dot connecting a bit to say the least, but his birthplace is just one of many pieces of “evidence” used to prove Kemal’s Jewishness.

(2)    Atatürk attended the Jewish Elementary School known as the Semsi Effendi School.

True, but much like the: Hitler had over 200,000 Jewish soldiers claim; context is missing in the statement. Semsi Effendi is attributed to being founded by the Donmeh (Turkish crypto Jew community). The Effendi was in no way an exclusively Jewish school, but rather a more “modern” school, even being described as more “Western” then the Muslim schools in the area. Semsi Effendi is described in all accounts as being “Secular”. Kemal first attended an Islamic school for a while, but having issue with the methods, the religious dogma,and noticing the different treatment of foreign students (foreigners able to sit up, while Muslim kids sitting cross legged on the floor),  topped with the encouragement of his Father attended Effendi, then entering a Military school.

(3)    Kemal’s Parents

Much is said about Kemal’s father being the Jewish link in Mustafa’s genetics. Proclaiming Kemal’s father to be a donmeh… A few things stick out when this claim is made. First Kemal’s father was not that secretive about his lack of enthusiasm for Islam;  not so “crypto” , his mother on the other hand wished Kemal to get an education under the Islamic way. (No claims have been made against his mother as far as being jewish). Kemal’s Father, Ali Rıza Efendi, came from the village Kodžadžik located in Centar Župa Municipality, with a non-existence Jewish population. Ali Riza’s ethnicity was and still is a disputed topic:

“He is thought to be of Albanian origin, although Falih Rıfkı Atay, journalist and close friend of Atatürk, holds that he has roots in Söke, in Aydın Province. Historian and biographer Patrick Kinross writes that ‘this can only be a matter for surmise’. The Jewish historian Hillel Halkin claimed that he was actually Jewish belonging to the Doemeh cult of Ottoman Jews.”

Kemal on his father: “My father was a man of liberal views, rather hostile to religion, and a partisan of Western ideas. He would have preferred to see me go to a * lay school, which did not found its teaching on the Koran but on modern science.  In this battle of consciences, my father managed to gain the victory after a small maneuver; he pretended to give in to my mother’s wishes, and arranged that I should enter the [Islamic] school of Fatma Molla Kadin with the traditional ceremony. … “Six months later, more or less, my father quietly withdrew me from the school and took me to that of old Shemsi Effendi who directed a free preparatory school according to European methods. My mother made no objection, since her desires had been complied with and her conventions respected. It was the ceremony above all which had satisfied her.” What is for sure is that Kemal does not share the typical perceived Turkish look. Nor did his mother from all accounts “with her dark blonde hair, deep blue eyes and fair skin” (pg.4 The Rebirth of a Nation by. Patrick Kinross)

(4)    Kemal admitted to an Jewish reporter that he was Jewish.

“It’s my secret prayer as well” is his alleged statement to a Jewish reporter. First that throws the united Jewish conspiracy out the window, because if it had existed he would not have to explain… But allegedly this is the conversation as Hillel Halkin recants it:

Hillel Halkin

“Itamar Ben-Avi, son of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the leading promoter of the revival of spoken Hebrew in late 19th-century Palestine. Ben-Avi, the first child to be raised in Hebrew since ancient times and later a Hebrew journalist and newspaper publisher, writes in this book of walking into the Kamenitz Hotel in Jerusalem one autumn night in 1911 and being asked by its proprietor:

Itamar Bben Avi

“‘Do you see that Turkish officer sitting there in the corner, the one* with the bottle of arrack?’ ”


“‘He’s one of the most important officers in the Turkish army.'”

“‘What’s his name?'”

“‘Mustafa Kemal.'”

“‘I’d like to meet him,’ I said, because the minute I looked at him I was startled by his piercing green eyes.”

Ben-Avi describes two meetings with Mustafa Kemal, who had not yet taken the name of Ataturk, ‘Father of the Turks.’ Both were conducted in French, were largely devoted to Ottoman politics, and were doused with large amounts of arrack. In the first of these, Kemal confided: “I’m a descendant of Sabbetai Zevi – not indeed a Jew any more, but an ardent admirer of this prophet of yours. My opinion is that every Jew in this country would do well to join his camp.”

During their second meeting, held 10 days later in the same hotel, Mustafa Kemal said at one point:” ‘I have at home a Hebrew Bible printed in Venice. It’s rather old, and I remember my father bringing me to a Karaite teacher who taught me to read it. I can still remember a few words of it, such as –‘ ” And Ben-Avi continues: “He paused for a moment, his eyes searching for something in space. Then he recalled: “‘Shema Yisra’el, Adonai Elohenu, Adonai Ehad!’

“‘That’s our most important prayer, Captain.’

“‘And my secret prayer too, cher monsieur,’ he replied, refilling our glasses.”

How convenient Kemal turns out to actually be a decedent of the secret Jewish prophet Zevi…Much like “Hitler was a Jew” scene, believes Hitler to be a descendant as a Rothschild… Not only are they Jews, but super Jews!

The only source on Kemal’s secret Jewish admission happens to be a Jew, then later recanted or simply created by another Jew.

It is convenient that a Jew promotes Atatürk’s alleged Jewishness, as Dietrich Eckart and Hitler point out in a conversation from “Bolshevism From Moses to Lenin: “A Jew, Luis de Torres, is supposed to have been the first

European to step on American soil.  And, topping everything else, the Jews have

recently claimed Columbus himself as one of them. ‘That’s not surprising,’ he (Hitler) laughed.  ‘Everyone who has somehow played a role in the

world, the dear Lord included, is a Jew.  They even have Goethe and Schopenhauer

  • on their list.  And blessed be he who believes it’.” (P. 26)

Jews of Salonica tried to claim Atatürk as their own, and Atatürk’s enemies slandered him with accusations, but Kemal was steadfast in his denial.

Hitler on Ataturk:  “We’ve lost some of our Germanics! The Berbers of the North Africa, the Kurds of Asia Minor. One of them was Kemal Ataturk, who had nothing to do with his compatriots, from the racial point of view” (P.230 Hitler’s Table talks)

So was he or wasn’t he Jewish?

It is common knowledge and found in “The Rebirth of a Nation”,   by Lord Kinross, that Kemal enjoyed alcohol, and whore houses, so we can definitely rule out he was a devout religious Jew. Racially was he Jewish? Due to his birthplace, his early, minimal, schooling at Semsi Effendi, his alleged “confession”, and the uncertainty of his Father’s origin…It is possibly plausible, but not proven.

There is no “smoking gun” outside of his alleged private confession. So if it cannot be actually proven if he is, or is not of Jewish decent, how can we judge him? Well if his ancestral line is open to debate, which it plainly is, we must then judge and evaluate his actions.

The Young Turks

Depending on your level of belief, you either think the young Turks, and Kemal were willingly and knowingly working for Jewish world agenda; or Kemal was subverted by Jews in the young Turks; or it was simply random occurrence that Jews were in the hierarchy of the young Turks. Let us examine the alleged Jews in the Hierarchy of the Young Turks :

Emmanuel Carasso: (Jew) Turkish lawyer and politician. Born in Salonika, Carasso lectured on

criminology at the university of Salonika. He was one of the prominent

figures in the Young Turk movement to which he gave considerable

material support. After the Young Turks seized power in 1908, Carasso

was elected deputy for Salonika in the Turkish parliament and headed

the committee which informed Sultan Abdul Hamid II of his deposition.

Subsequently, he was a member of the parliamentary commission of 1912

which negotiated the treaty of Ouchy concluding peace with Italy. He

was adviser to the Turkish government during World War I and in

recognition of his services was granted licenses to export Turkish

goods to Germany which enabled him to amass a considerable fortune.

However, when Kemal Atatürk came to power in 1923, Carasso fell into

disfavor and his fortune was confiscated. He lived his last years in

penury in Italy and died in Trieste.”


Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 5. Kefer Publishing House, Jerusalem, 1971.

Talaat Pasha (1874–1921) One of the main players in the “Armenian genocide” is alleged to be a Jew, but, no proof of the accusation has been documented and presented, outside of websites simply saying he is Jewish with no sources. He taught Turkish at Jewish school, and nailed himself a Jewish girl.

Mehmet Cavit Bey (1875-1926) Said to be Jewish (no proof found, outside of accusation) and Freemason. Executed by Atatürk for attempting to murder Atatürk.

Russo, Nissim (Jew) Nissim Russo was born in Salonica in the late nineteenth century. He was one of the few Turkish Jews to participate in politics around the beginning of the twentieth century, serving as an undersecretary in the Ministry of Finance and as a member of the Ottoman parliament.

Throughout his political career, Russo lobbied the Turkish government to support Zionism.

Refik Saydam (September 8, 1881, July 8, 1942,) Accused Jew by websites, but no proof of Jewishness offered. Was Prime minster during period when Turkey let Germany know:  The Turkish Information Agency is stated to have dismissed a considerable number of Jews from its employment. 6th of May 1942 (pg.463 of Hitler’s Table Talks)

Ze’ev Jabotinsky  (18 October 1880 – 4 August 1940) (Jew)  Dint really have a prominent role in the Young Turks, but often mentioned on conspiracy websites as having one. In 1909 – 1910, he was delegated to develop Zionist activities in Turkey. While there he edited simultaneously four Zionist periodicals, one of which was in French. He received an important political assignment from the World Zionist Organization to est ablish contact with the new Young Turk Government. Upon his return to Russia he assumed the initiative in organizing Jewish self-defense units and at the same time he fought in speech and writing for Jewish minority rights and civil equality. Jewish you th idolized him, whilst the assimilationists bitterly opposed him.

At the outbreak of World War I, the 34 -year old Jabotinsky was the hero of Russian Zionism. He was the most sought after speaker and lecturer, who on his endless tours crisscrossed the length and breadth of the Russian Empire. He was in the vanguard of the fight against Jewish assimilationists and for recognition of Jewish national rights in Russia. He was twice nominated as the Zionist candidate to the “Duma”, the Parliament of Czarist Russia. As the outstanding spokesman of Russian Zionism, Jabotin sky stood firm in his position in furtherance of his maximal Zionist program encompassing the Hebraization of the Jewish schools and elevation of Hebrew to the status of our national language.

On the eve of the war, he traveled extensively in the countries of the Allies as correspondent of “Russkiya Vyedomosti”. When Turkey, in 1915, joined forces with Germany, he realized that Turkey was bound to be defeated. He seized the opportunity to adv ance the cause of Zionism among the Allied powers by propagating the idea of the Jewish Legion to fight alongside the armies of the Allies.

It was in Bordeaux, France, that the news of Turkey’s alliance with Germany had reached Jabotinsky. The effect of this news on Jabotinsky is best described in his own words:

“I must confess: until that morning in Bordeaux as everywhere else, I had been a mere observer, without any particular reasons for wishing full triumph to one side and crushing disaster to the other. My desire at that time was: stalemate, and peace as soon as possible. Turkey’s moved transformed me in one short morning into a fanatical believer in victory of the Allies….That morning in Bordeaux, after reading the damp poster on the wall, I drew the only logical conclusion possible – and to this day I don’t understandwhy it took numbers of my friends so many years to reach such a simple conclusion…”

Alexander Parvus (September 8, 1867, December 12, 1924,) (Jew) There (in Turkey) he set up an arms trading company which profited handsomely during the Balkan War. He became the financial and political advisor of the Young Turks. In 1912 he was made editor of Turk Yurdu, their daily newspaper. He worked closely with the triumvirs known as the Three Pashas – Enver, Talat and Cemal – and Finance Minister Djavid Bey. The triumvirs of Three Pashas planned and executed the Armenian Massacres in 1915. His firm dealt with the deliveries of foodstuffs for the Turkish army and he was a business partner of the Krupp concern, of Vickers Limited, and of the famous arms dealer Basil Zaharov. Arms dealings with Vickers Limited at war time gave basis to the theory that Alexander Parvus was also a British intelligence asset.

Rothschilds, are have alleged to have funded the Young Turks, presumably through Parvus… When have the Rothschilds not funded war, or upheavals? Regardless of the side, you can bet where there is warfare there is Rothschild money to be found.

So yes, the Young Turks had Jews as members, also many Turks, but let us focus on the Jews. What political movement or Politian has not had Jews knowingly or unknowingly surrounding them?

When the question of Ataturk and knowingly working for Jewish agenda come to play, the circumstances do not support the reality, namely in the case of Emmanuel Carasso and Mehmet Cavit Bey. If they were all Jews working towards Jewish agenda, there would be no fall out amongst each other, as they all would be taking orders from higher powers, but as easily seen, that is not the case, completion, distrust, and dislike existed amongst the Young Turks and Ataturk.

Ataturk’s Actions

Thus on October 19, 1923, less than three months after the signing of the Lausanne Treaty (July 24, 1923), Fevzi Bey, the Turkish minister of public works, declared during a press conference,124a

According to the arrangements concluded with the foreign companies, the latter must engage Turkish employees only. This does not mean that they can employ all subjects of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey indiscriminately. They must employ Muslim Turks only. If the foreign companies do not shortly dismiss their Greek, Armenian, and Jewish servants, I shall be compelled to cancel the privileges under which they are authorized to function in Turkey. This decision is irrevocable.

Frank Weber has summarized Turkey’s unenviable record of treatment of its small Jewish minority during the years leading up to World War II, following the 1934 pogrom against Thracian Jewry: 

Ataturk… would not permit the immigration into Turkey of central European Jews whose futures were endangered by the rising tide of Hitler’s own antisemitism. In some cases, his government contemplated deporting Jews back to central Europe, even though they had been domiciled in Turkey for years. The Turks never carried out these expulsions, but Inonu, when he came to power, absolutely refused to alter Ataturk’s restrictions on Jewish immigration. Even when Chaim Weizmann, the Zionist leader, promised that each Jewish immigrant would bring a capital of three thousand pounds sterling, the new president would not change his mind. Instead, he allowed the Turkish press to circulate “wild rumors” about the Jews, who were accused, among other things, of selling olive oil adulterated with machine oil to simple Turkish consumers. Inonu cited Hitler’s antisemitism in support of his own, and announced that one of the goals of his new government would be the elimination of the Jewish middlemen from the Turkish economy”

 Also from the government set up by Kemal:

“When Şevket Adalan took the tax assessment lists for Istanbul to the capital, the Turkish government, while approving our proposed system of classification (Muslims/non-Muslims) set new tax rates for the Greeks, Armenians, and Jews. Instead of being two or three times more, as we suggested, non-Muslim taxes were to be five to ten times the amounts levied on Muslim Turks with corresponding estimated wealth [emphasis added]…What appeared so glaring in the new assessment lists was the difference between the tax rates imposed on Muslim Turks on the one hand and the Greek, Armenian, and Jewish minorities on the other. But the greatest surprise that Adalan brought from Ankara was the order to include private salary earners and peddlers in the Capital Tax. Both my colleagues and I [had] envisaged the Varlik tax as a tax on capital…Such a tax could not have been collected from salary earners who were themselves victims of the inflationary conditions and had already witnessed a dramatic drop in their standard of living. According to instructions from Ankara, we had the power to exempt sections of the salary-earning group from the tax. As a result Adalan and I agreed to exempt all the Muslim Turkish salary earners and concentrate solely on the non-Muslims. Our suggestion met with the approval of Ankara.

This tax discrimination even extended to Turkish Muslims of Jewish ancestry (Donme):

…”On the verbal instructions of Ankara, a new class of taxpayers, the Donme class (D) of Jewish converts to Islam) was instituted, which was taxed at rates double those for Muslims (M). After a thorough examination of the available data some Donme Turks were taken out of the lists and placed in the class of extraordinary taxpayers. At a stroke our system began to be permeated by Hitler’s hysterical racist attitudes.”

“Over 12,000 Jews welcomed to Turkey” Implies 12,000 Jews went to Turkey in 1933 from Germany, but in fact: “some 1200 scholars and scientists were dismissed from German institutions in 1933-1934, 650 of whom emigrated. Considering that 190 of the 650 (29%) immigrated to Turkey this is a significant percentage.  Of the 190 who found their way to Turkey a small number came from Austria after the Anschluss in 1938, and one each from Czechoslovakia and France.  The few who remained in Turkey are buried there. Most eventually came to the US and catapulted America’s science, humanities, and mathematics, to new heights. Some went to what is now the State of Israel.”

Kemal, was not Jewish intellectual propped up to run a subversive Crypto Jewish party, but in fact a battle tested solider and National revolutionary. Much like an early Mussolini, he (Atatürk) seemed not to put much emphasis on the Jewish ethnicity, but rather Turkish Nationalism.

Yes, Ataturk was the final nail in the ottoman coffin… Was it Jewish agenda to confront and destroy a cultural Marxist mystic religion unnatural to the Turks? Where all one of any creed or culture has to do is convert to become a “Brother”; “Muslim”and “worker” seem to be interchangeable. A Jewish plan to build Nationalism for a country other than Israel!? That is unheard of, in fact, when one examines the countries, peoples, and leaders that openly confronted Jewish modernism, primarily Nationalist are found.

Did the Young Turks, some of Jewish ethnicity partake and plan the Armenian genocide? Yes, is there brutality in war? Of course, should one have mercy on a perceived enemy? Are only  active soldiers considered enemies? I guess that depends on each person’s own moral and philosophical judgment.  But by all means if one wants to “blame Jews” for Genocide, have at it. But reality does not show us Mustafa Kemal, took part in such actions for Jewish world agenda advancement.

Did Jews in Turkey get special treatment, as one would expect from a alleged Jewish run Turkish society?     No.

When speaking on characters of Histroy such as Ataturk or even someone like Stalin, the easy answer is to lump everyone into a simplistic label, as all being Jews, or knowingly involved in Jewish world advancement. But when one studies the lives of such people, and their surroundings, including the people that surrounded them, it is clear there is no simple answer, but rather quite complicated ones, that cannot be easily swept away under sensationalist bold print on a blog; especially when most sources stem from people with personal bias and attachment. Of course, many who view Mustafa Kemal as a devil, may not take the time to step back research and and evaluate the Ataturk Question… As Nietzsche once said:Anyone who has declared someone else to be an idiot, a bad apple, is annoyed when it turns out in the end that he isn’t.”